HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 22K | 36.6K |
| 81 | 456 | 581 |
| section | 23.3K | 38.3K |
| 2 | 23.7K | 33.5K |
-
Help with LR questionsHello everyone, While going through my last few practice tests , I have noticed that I have two consistent problems regarding LR sections. 1)…
... has drilling sets from particular PT ranges, something incredibly helpful.)
PT.
Because vague ... example: today I took PT 56. Section 3 Question 10 on that ... 12 days ago I reviewed PT 37 Section 2 Question 19, is the ... -
'Even without''even without' does not seem to follow our group 3 indicator rules.... Ella can pass even without giving her presentation Using Group 3 rules I…
... stuck on this while doing PT 37 section 2 qs 3.....such an ... -
Old LSAT QuestionsHi! Is anyone else looking at 10 Actual, Official LSAT Preptests, even though they are less relevant? Let's talk about them here!
OK, working on PT 9 - Section 2 - Question 23:
This ... stimulus. The second difficulty was 2) realizing that the missing sufficient ... -
PT41.S2.Q13 (G3) - Each of the seven members of the boardHello, I had a question concerning PT 41, Section 2 Q13. This is from LG 3. Q13 asks for a complete and accurate list of members that could be in the…
... , I had a question concerning PT 41, Section 2 Q13. This is from ... of the members could be...?**" (2)
👉 If the question ... /> The difference between (1) and (2) is subtle but actually pretty ... -
Flaw Questions: Sufficiency/Necessary distinction issuesIn questions where it is appears that there is a Sufficiency/Necessary issue, are there examples of questions where the SA/NA answer is a trap? I fin…
... from my reading is PT 51 Section 1 Question 20, where ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-51-section-1-question-20/
... /> -The first comes from PT 75 Section 1 Question 12 where answer ... Necess flaw well: please see PT 22 Section 2 Question 25. Here we ... -
Flaw Questions: Sufficiency/Necessary distinction issuesIn questions where it is appears that there is a Sufficiency/Necessary issue, are there examples of questions where the SA/NA answer is a trap? I fin…
... from my reading is PT 51 Section 1 Question 20, where ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-51-section-1-question-20/
... -The first comes from PT 75 Section 1 Question 12 where answer ... Necess flaw well: please see PT 22 Section 2 Question 25. Here we ... -
Confusing S for N versus N for SPremise: Resign--->Convicted Conclusion: Convicted--->Resign Would this be confusing N for S or S for N? I thought the two were interchangeable but…
The answer choice says confusing S for N though. That is why I am confused. PT 22, Section 2, #25 -
Using LawgicIve become familiar with the system of translation but Im still struggling to understand the practical use of making the translations. Is it just tha…
... separated from B by exactly 2 spots with A preceding B ... can help us.
2. The second practical use in ... illustration of this please see PT 49 Section 2 Question 7.
PT92.S2.Q21 (G4) - Why wouldn't F's commercial be first?Why isn't "FIGHK" possible? I think the answer should be C instead of E, help, I am loosing it... **Admin Note: Edited title. Please use the form…
I assume this is PT 92 - Section 2 - Game 4? Which question are you referencing?Suppose the condition "" was replaced with Tips?Does anyone have any tips for these questions? I tend to have to work through each answer choice to see if it would have a similar effect to the remo…
... a good example for this (PT 69, Section 2, Game 3, Question 17 ... just cross out 1 or 2 answer choices right off the ...PT 72 Section 3Is section 3 of PT 72 unusually hard? I've been told that PT 72 is weird and I shouldn't be discouraged by lower scores on this test than the others.…
... section 3 of PT 72 unusually hard? I've been told that PT ... on the first LR section of this PT but I did horribly ... on section 3. What are your ... experiences with this PT?Superprep 2 PTHas anyone taken the never-before-disclosed PT from Superprep 2?
Has anyone taken the never-before-disclosed PT from Superprep 2?PT 29.S2.P1 - for some years before the outbreak of world war 1https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-29-section-2-passage-1-passage Hi everyone - I'm currently working on Reading Comprehension and am work…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-29-section-2-passage-1-passage
Hi ... 35, an art passage from PT 29 is dissected.
PT June 2007.S2.Q24 - car companies solicit consumer informationI have been analyzing all the June 2007 (public domain) questions one by one, and find that they all neatly fit into very neat symbolic argument patt…
... symbolic argument patterns--except for Section II Question 24. I would ... if this is a free PT! You can see the question ... .com/lsat_explanations/lsat-june-2007-section-2-question-24[Spoiler Alert] LR Issues PT 69 - Section 4There were several questions in this section that seemed to provide answers that I could not seem to justify even after BRing, not sure if this type …
... were several questions in this section that seemed to provide answers ... seemed as if it presented 2 necessary conditions for the book ... year -
1. important;
2. well written.
I ...Question: Cambridge PT 5th Section (PT-A)?I just found a copy of PT74 I bought from CambridgeLSAT awhile ago. It looks like it's got 5 sections, with the 3rd section labeled as (PT-A) on the …
... sections, with the 3rd section labeled as (PT-A) on the Answer ... to indicate whether this section came from another PT.
Are ...PT 59 - wtf happened to my score???I recently took PT 59. I've been scoring in the low to mid-160s, but this time it dropped to 156. I suppose a 4ish point drop isn't that big of a de…
I recently took PT 59.
I've been ... away)
On Sec 2 (LR), I got 6 answers ... 't perform like this on Section 2. Maybe I was tired especially ... hitting Section 3 (but usually this doesn ...[Ended] PT 79 Blind Review with J.Y. | Multiple SessionsHey 7Sagers, I want to try something different for PT 79 (September 2016 LSAT). Instead of making videos, I will lead BR sessions. (Videos will be …
... try something different for PT 79 (September 2016 ... 2, and RC. Each session will focus on only one section of PT ... br /> 11/18 Friday - Section 2 - RC
11/19 ... br /> 11/21 Monday - Section 2 - RC
11/22 ... br /> 11/25 Friday - Section 2 - RC
11/26 ...PT 80 Blind Review with J.Y. | Multiple SessionsHey 7Sagers, it was a lot of fun [Blind Reviewing PT 79](https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/9414/ended-pt-79-blind-review-with-j-y-multiple-se…
... 2, and RC. Each session will focus on only one section of PT ... Session
3/28 Tuesday - Section 2 - RC
7:30p - 10 ... Sessions
3/5 Sunday - Section 1 - LR
3/6 ... /> 3/18 Saturday - Section 4 - LR
3/27 Monday - Section 2 - RCPT 80 Blind Review | Multiple SessionsHey 7Sagers, I'm leading BR calls for PT 80 (December 2016 LSAT). I'm holding 9 sessions total. 3 for each of LR 1, LR 2, and RC. Each session wi…
... 2, and RC. Each session will focus on only one section of PT ... - LR
5/20 Saturday - Section 2 - RC, Passages 1 and 3 ...
5/23 Tuesday - Section 2 - RC, Passages 2 and 4
5 ... /> 5/25 Thursday - Section 4 - LR
5/26 Friday - Section 2 - RCBreaking the curve...167ish average to 170+Good morning 7Sage, I am back - as always - to ask some advice from everyone. Let me start by showing a break down of my last 5 PT's numbers. PT…
... down of my last 5 PT's numbers.
... -1LG 167
PT 81: -4 RC, -12 LR, -2 LG 164 (wtf ... fairly often. In-between PT 81 and 66 I went back ... average a -6 in this section. The biggest thing here ... know this is the hardest section to improve, but I ...Abandon Ship?Up until last week, I was feeling really confident. My previous five scores (under strictly timed/bubbled/public conditions): PT 57- 179 (defi…
... ):
PT 57- 179 (definitely an ... PT 72- 173
PT 66- 173
PT 71- 173
PT ... 77- 176
PT 81 ... -2 LR, -2 RC)
For both 81 and ... finish an LG section in about 10 tests ...PT5 Reading Comp Section 4For those of you who found the RC difficult from the June '17 (PT 81) test and want more practice like that, you should check out PT 5's RC section. …
... difficult from the June '17 (PT 81) test and want more practice ... , you should check out PT 5's RC section. I thought it ... a really similar way to PT 81 with a similar distribution of ...PT 80 Questions?How would people characterize the LR in PT 80 compared to PT 81 or other preptests in general? I felt surprisingly confident as things seemed to clic…
... characterize the LR in PT 80 compared to PT 81 or other preptests ... better on this LR section compared to PT 79's LR when ... taking PT 81 before Saturday or maybe just take PT 81 RC as a section?How to select an experimental section to add to a full PT?Hey 7sagers, I'm wondering from what sample of experimental sections you guys select to simulate a real LSAT exam. Do you choose them from earlie…
... choose them from earlier PT's (1~40's ... e.g. Full PT 71+ PT 65 Section 3 as an experimental ... section)?
I ... breaking up a recent PT into experimental sections would ... loss of a full recent PT.
What ...1st PT Post-CC: 160, 178 BR advice/next steps?I just finished BR for my 1st PT Post-CC, scores below (planning on taking the September 2018 test): Raw Score: 160, BR: 178 LG: -9, -0 LR: -10,…
... finished BR for my 1st PT Post-CC, scores below (planning ... this being my first timed pt (and having not done ANYTHING ... the end of the section. Heading into section 2 (LR), I was still ... this is only my first pt and isnt necessarily indicative of ...First PT Post CCHi everyone, I recently just took my first fully timed PT after completing the CC. I did not take a diagnostic test so I don't know how much I wou…
... took my first fully timed PT after completing the CC. ... on PT 37 with a BR of 166. My section breakdown ... RC: -6 / BR: -4
Section 2 LR: -12 / BR: -6
PT I finished logic games on ... when I take a fresh PT? I would assume my ...Subtle LR changes in PT 80+Hi everyone, I had been practicing with the LSAT official books (50s, 60s, 70s) and I recently purchased the 80s via 7sage. I noticed that in the …
... didn't... for example, in PT 83 section 1 #18 (LR):
2 more fresh 80s that I ...PT88 BR with J.Y. on Nov. 1 - 16, 2 - 5pm ETHey 7Sagers, I'm leading BR calls for PT 88 (September 2019 LSAT). There will be 16 sessions total. All sessions will be from **2 - 5pm ET**.…
... 'm leading BR calls for PT 88 (September 2019 LSAT). < ... /> [none]
Obtaining PT 88
If you have ... able to view and print [PT 88 under the Syllabus](https ... br />
Saturday, November 2
Section 2 - LR, Questions 15 - 25
PT89 BR with J.Y. on Jan. 29 - Feb. 16, 2 - 5pm ETHey 7Sagers, I'm leading BR calls for PT 89 (November 2019 LSAT). There will be 16 sessions total. All sessions will be from **2 - 5pm ET**. …
... m leading BR calls for PT 89 (November 2019 LSAT ... unmarked copy of the PT ready in front of ... [none]
Obtaining PT 89
If you have ... to view and print [PT 89 under the Syllabus ... />
Sun, Feb 2
Section 2 - LR, Questions 15 - 26 ...
