HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 22K | 36.6K |
| 85 | 400 | 494 |
| section | 23.3K | 38.3K |
| 2 | 23.7K | 33.4K |
| lr | 21.4K | 37.5K |
-
PT9.S2.Q20 - A university should not be encouraged to patent...Can someone explain why the correct answer choice is A for PT 9, Section 2, Question 20?
Can someone explain why the correct answer choice is A for PT 9, Section 2, Question 20? -
How to Understand "most" questions that the curriculum FAILS to teach how to solve?I feel like I'm getting burned by questions that don't use the exhaustive formal logic to solve them. For example, PT 126 Section 3 Question 14…
... />
For example, PT 126 Section 3 Question 14 uses 'most ... across several PT's. For example, see PT 127, Section 2, Question ... see PT 131 Section 3 Question 7. PT B Section 4 ... PT 19 Section 2 Question 18.
PT 151 Section 2 ... -
Point of Issue - Y/N list or honing in on difference?Hello there. Question on point of issue questions - which is better? doing the list method or reading through and determining the disagreement/agree…
Hey Quinn, a great example of the "MSS" is PT 61, Section 2 Q7.
Notice how Talbert didn't say anything about Chess should be taught. Talbert just lists good factors about chess which you have to imply that Talbert is for chess. -
PT72.S1.Q22 (P4) - first country to introduce a "flat tax" on incomehttp://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-72-section-1-passage-4-questions/ Anyone can tell me why option D is wrong? Passage A mentions an objectio…
... take that out.
2. When you make an argument ... are 23 and 25 from section 2 LR.
4. As much ... -
PrepTest 72 for $5.97<strong>PT 72 and all video explanations are ready for sale for just $5.97.</strong> That's the lowest price you'll find anywhere. You also ge…
... 'm pretty sure the second LR is section 3. I'm looking ...
Section 1: RC
Section 2: LR
Section 3: LR
Section 4: LG ... -
Negating a Conditional StatementHey guys, I can't remember where this was in the course, but what is the proper way to negate a conditional statment? So for example: ~ (X-->Y)…
If any one is curious the question that I'm looking at with regards to the above is PT 49, Section 2 Question 17 -
Negating a Conditional StatementHey guys, I can't remember where this was in the course, but what is the proper way to negate a conditional statment? So for example: ~ (X-->Y)…
... "Some and Most Relationships." PT 30, Section 2, Q20 has an illustration of ... -
PT35.S2.P4 - ronald dworkin argues that judges arehttp://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-35-section-2-passage-4-passage/ I am a long-time lurker that is gearing up for the October exam. I really…
Following up on RC: PT 35, Section 2
My specific questions include:< ... -
Weaken, Principle and FlawI've gotten to a point where the only types of questions I'm missing are weaken, principle or flaw questions. I usually am on the right path to the c…
... recently gotten wrong include: Principle: PT 54 Section 2 Q18 (answered A, correct ... answer was C), PT 54 Section 4 Q9 ... answer was A); Flaw: PT 54 Section 2 Q15 (answered B, correct answer ... -
PT74.S1.Q16 - debater: as a pedagogical practiceHi folks, I'm struggling with this question in BR. So I figured I'd post my reasoning and see what you all think of it. Debater: Premise 1:Be…
... as the LSAT (See PT 19 Section 2 Question 1 for a throwback ... -
PT76.S2.Q18 - an article claims that many medical patientsCan someone please explain in a real simple way I read the explanation but I just don't get it with these types of questions Thank you in advance …
... this PT although I did unusually worse on the RC section. Might ... 'd actually recommend re-visiting PT 23, Section 2, Question 16. It hinges ... -
Anyone else feel like they could have scored either a 140 or a 170?I am not going to lie, I could see it going either way. I went with my first choice every single time, without making sure that it wasn't a trap answ…
... ), I felt pretty good about section 2 (LR). Then, they hit me with ... 'm not mistaken, my third section/second RC was the experimental ... I hope it was! 4th section (LR) didn't go so well ... -
Beliefs v. FactsI've only come across this type of flaw a few times, but I'd like to understand the structure behind it. The explanation and example offered in the c…
Just came across an excellent example of this flaw on a really, really valuable question: PT 31 Section 2 question 21. -
Help with LR questionsHello everyone, While going through my last few practice tests , I have noticed that I have two consistent problems regarding LR sections. 1)…
... phenomena can be found on PT 49 Section 2 Question 7. I've ... : I'm thinking here of PT 53 Section 1 Question 8. I ... -
Help with LR questionsHello everyone, While going through my last few practice tests , I have noticed that I have two consistent problems regarding LR sections. 1)…
... has drilling sets from particular PT ranges, something incredibly helpful.)
PT.
Because vague ... example: today I took PT 56. Section 3 Question 10 on that ... 12 days ago I reviewed PT 37 Section 2 Question 19, is the ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... experimental.
Section 2: LR. Hardest LR I can remember.
Section 3: LG. ... br /> Section 4: RC. Killed it
Section 5: LR. Killed it ... that LR really was hard. By the end of section 2, the ... hinge on S2 LR. LR is my strongest section, and that's ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... the experimental.
> Section 2: LR. Hardest LR I can remember.
> ... . Killed it
> Section 5: LR. Killed it
> ... and that LR really was hard. By the end of section 2, the ... hinge on S2 LR. LR is my strongest section, and that's ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... the experimental.
> Section 2: LR. Hardest LR I can remember.
> ... and that LR really was hard. By the end of section 2, the ... will hinge on S2 LR. LR is my strongest section, and that's ... sobbing in the middle of Section 2-- One of them had to ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... the experimental.
> Section 2: LR. Hardest LR I can remember.
> ... and that LR really was hard. By the end of section 2, the ... hinge on S2 LR. LR is my strongest section, and that's ... than -1 on LR can find an LR section to be extremely difficult ... -
September LSAT Curve BreakersTitle pretty much says everything, but which questions do you guys think were the curve breakers for the logical reasoning sections? Just trying to …
I thought Section 2 LR #17 about corrections to research findings was difficult, though that was the point in the test where I started to freak out and wasn't thinking clearly. I do think this stimulus was weirdly worded though. -
'Even without''even without' does not seem to follow our group 3 indicator rules.... Ella can pass even without giving her presentation Using Group 3 rules I…
... stuck on this while doing PT 37 section 2 qs 3.....such an ... -
How to truly 'take in' what you've read on the first try?Hi all, Hope everyone is doing well :3 I seem to have developed this habit while I was in university where I don't really 'take in' what I read…
... .'s live commentary for PT81 section 2 LR, I noticed that he uses ... .'s live commentary for PT81 section 2 LR: https://7sage.com/lesson/preptest ... -
How to truly 'take in' what you've read on the first try?Hi all, Hope everyone is doing well :3 I seem to have developed this habit while I was in university where I don't really 'take in' what I read…
... .'s live commentary for PT81 section 2 LR, I noticed that he uses ... .'s live commentary for PT81 section 2 LR: https://7sage.com/lesson/preptest ... -81-s2-lr-live-commentary/
Old LSAT QuestionsHi! Is anyone else looking at 10 Actual, Official LSAT Preptests, even though they are less relevant? Let's talk about them here!
OK, working on PT 9 - Section 2 - Question 23:
This ... stimulus. The second difficulty was 2) realizing that the missing sufficient ...PT41.S2.Q13 (G3) - Each of the seven members of the boardHello, I had a question concerning PT 41, Section 2 Q13. This is from LG 3. Q13 asks for a complete and accurate list of members that could be in the…
... , I had a question concerning PT 41, Section 2 Q13. This is from ... of the members could be...?**" (2)
👉 If the question ... /> The difference between (1) and (2) is subtle but actually pretty ...PT87 BR with J.Y. on July 30 - August 12, 9 - 11pm ETHey 7Sagers, I'm leading BR calls for PT 87 (June 2019 LSAT). There will be twelve sessions total. All sessions will be from **9 - 11pm ET**.…
For the next call:
Wednesday July 31
9 - 11pm ET
LR Section 2
Questions 16 - 26
We will be looking at only the second half of Section 2, LR. Questions 16 - 26 only.PT88 BR with J.Y. on Nov. 1 - 16, 2 - 5pm ETHey 7Sagers, I'm leading BR calls for PT 88 (September 2019 LSAT). There will be 16 sessions total. All sessions will be from **2 - 5pm ET**.…
Since BR for November 1 and November 3 are both on section 2 LR questions 1-14, does it mean that section 2 LR will be taught/discussed twice? If so then yayyyy because I am planning on taking PT88 this weekend! Thank you @ JY!!!Actual Form of LSATHi guys ... I'm going to ask a relatively simple question that's been confusing me a lot. I'm currently in doing the "How to Take a Simulated LSAT…
... that there are 4 graded section (2 LR, 1 RC, and 1 LG ... ) and one experimental section that you will not know ... the type of section it is. You will also ... added in an experimental 5th section when I was ready.
