... , by accident, that PT 26 S1 Game 2 and PT 81 S4 Game ... because I had randomly done PT 26 S1 game 2 as a ... warmup LG before taking PT 81 today ...
I second @"Nilesh S"
I'm pretty sure it would be against rules to post actual screenshots of the stimulus. But if you use referencing such as "PT 35 S1 Q15" and then post your question about it, then it should be alright.
I'm talking about the Misc Category from 7Sage for example PT 40 S1 Q10, Q15. I see now that I can just figure out the type myself. Like Q10 is something like an Identify the Disagreement type.
We want an answer that contradicts the stimulus, not one that is irrelevant. The stimulus essentially states that if you’re restricting, then you preventing negative effects. TO contradict that,we negate it: Restricting AND not preventing negative effects. ...
Interesting. You're positive the NA isn't actually necessary? I'm curious about these examples. I didn't look closely at it, but PT 71.S1.Q11 seems to be about pollution. Is that the right reference? PT means PrepTest, right?
The stimulus doesn't allow us to conclude this. Grass clippings are one way to get micro-nutrients, but the stimulus doesn't say it's the ONLY way. Thus, when the ...
... of text (e.g. PT 16 S1 Game 1, and line diagrams ... (e.g. PT 9 S3 ... are part way through a PT, the annotations that were ... saved with that PT may not show up ... look strange. Sorry! If the PT is already completed, this shouldn ...
Also, not sure about PT92, but PT 90 is the May 2020 PT with an added section, so if nothing else, the explanations for 3/4 sections are already available on 7sage.
... took the most recently released PT (92) and scored the same as ... around 5 points less than PT. Maybe they're just embellishing ... their PT scores, but it doesn't ...
... took the most recently released PT (92) and scored the same as ... around 5 points less than PT. Maybe they're just embellishing ... their PT scores, but it doesn't ...