HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 22K | 36.6K |
| 92 | 234 | 277 |
| s2 | 1.2K | 1.6K |
| q8 | 63 | 73 |
-
PT 38 S2 Q 24But I was under the impression that conditional statements are not comparisons. I read the first sentence as a comparison and therefore ignored it si…
But I was under the impression that conditional statements are not comparisons. I read the first sentence as a comparison and therefore ignored it since I did not read it as a conditional statement. How should I have broken down the first sentence to see ... -
PT 38 S2 Q20I am still confused why the conclusion is adequate productivity --> high- tech technology. I negated the high tech technology part because of the "n…
I am still confused why the conclusion is adequate productivity --> high- tech technology. I negated the high tech technology part because of the "not" present in the sentence. I tried reviewing my notes and I can't find where he explains in the ... -
PT.51 S1 Q8How is is C the correct answer... I'm not seeing the connection. Someone please help! The conclusion is "we can now dismiss the widely held suspi…
How is is C the correct answer... I'm not seeing the connection. Someone please help!
The conclusion is "we can now dismiss the widely held suspicion that sugar consumption often exacerbates hyperactivity in children with attention deficit ... -
PT 76 S2 Q 25 - It is likely that most of the newCould anyone explain why D rather than C is correct? P: (1) most of the new shows produced last year by WW were canceled; (2) this year's new sho…
Could anyone explain why D rather than C is correct?
P: (1) most of the new shows produced last year by WW were canceled;
(2) this year's new shows are all police dramas, and few police dramas have been popular in recent years
C: ... -
PT 61.S2.Q3 - political administrationI did not understand the explanation in the video. I diagrammed the following based on my understanding. ES and PIL ---> OS PIL ---> OS/e …
I did not understand the explanation in the video.
I diagrammed the following based on my understanding.
ES and PIL ---> OS
PIL ---> OS/e
Therefore, /E and PIL
I chose answer ... -
Statistical ReasoningCan some of you awesome people weigh in on statistical reasoning as it's used in the LSAT? For example, PT 18 S2 Q4. Specifically, things like probab…
Can some of you awesome people weigh in on statistical reasoning as it's used in the LSAT? For example, PT 18 S2 Q4. Specifically, things like probability or likelihood trip me up. Any resources or explanations would be appreciated! Thanks! -
PT 41.S2.G3 - each of the seven membersI'm reviewing why I struggled more than I should've on game 3, and JY labeled the in/out differently than I did. He labels "finance" as out and "ince…
I'm reviewing why I struggled more than I should've on game 3, and JY labeled the in/out differently than I did. He labels "finance" as out and "incentives" as in. I switched mine around and while I was still able to solve the game, I struggled more than I ... -
Establishing a CorrelationI would appreciate if somebody could clarify this one for me.. https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-72-section-2-question-14/ Here, JY equate…
... a similar question on the PT 72 S2 Q14 down in the ... -
PT June2007.S2.Q16 - taylor: researchers at a local university The statements provide the most support for holding that Sandra would disagree with Taylor about which one of the following statements? Answer: …
The statements provide the most support for holding that Sandra would disagree with Taylor about which one of the following statements?
Answer: D) Some sciences can yield mathematically precise results that are not inherently suspect.
... -
(Theory question) Why do you negate a conditional by negating the necessary?Specifically, I am looking at PT 68.S2.Q23, the second sentence: "We must therefore reject Tolstoy's rash claim that if we knew a lot about the event…
Specifically, I am looking at PT 68.S2.Q23, the second sentence: "We ... -
Need Help with MSS v. Strengthen, v. Correlation/Causation StrengthenI am stuck on some of the MSS questions, Weaken, and the difference with how to tell MSS and Strengthen apart especially when C/C Strengthen is in pl…
... play.
For example, PT 16, S2, Q21 was on a webinar ... -
PT 34.S2.Q11 - some psychologists claim thatFlaw Question-- calling all folks who are a beast at LR:) HELP? I understand that the answer is C but I want to make sure that I'm breaking down …
Flaw Question-- calling all folks who are a beast at LR:) HELP?
I understand that the answer is C but I want to make sure that I'm breaking down the argument correctly:
*Best way to understand --> Direct Empathy (that's what some ... -
Hardest & Most Difficult LSAT Sections ever listedHey guys, I know we only finished with the test a week ago, and even some are finishing up in Florida today (Congrats btw!). And I haven't even reall…
... , PT 14 s2, PT 17 s2, PT 21 s3, PT 22 s2&4, PT 23 s3, PT 25 s2, PT ... , PT 48 s4, PT 49 s2, PT 51 s3, PT 56 s2, PT 58 s1, PT 59 s2, PT 63 ... s3, PT 71 ... -
Meaning of "excludes," different than "presumes" or "takes for granted"?Hello all, I was reviewing PT 77 S2 Q18 (link below) and was having a bit of trouble clarifying my thinking on it. If an argument "fails to exc…
... />
I was reviewing PT 77 S2 Q18 (link below) and was ... -
Causation/correlation and phenomenonHello, everyone. I’ve been drilling strengthening questions and I’m having an issue with causation/correlation and phenomenon type arguments. The lin…
... arguments. I initially had PT 25-S2-Q10 as causation because I ... my greatest worry. For PT23-S2-Q14 I initially chose phenomenon ... -
LR "curve-breaker questions" list?Hey guys! I'm sure most of you, like me, get excited whenever JY says that a question is a curve breaker question and you happened to get it right. I…
I don't understand how to do evaluate questionsHow is the answer to PT 7 S4 Q8 E?
How is the answer to PT 7 S4 Q8 E?Wildly Inconsistent LR Scores after completing the Core Curriculum. Plz HelpSince completion of the CC, my LR scores have been ridiculously inconsistent. Here are the stats: PT 40 S1 -9 S3 -4 PT 41 S1 -4 S3 -3 PT 42 S2 -…
... are the stats:
PT 40 S1 -9 S3 -4 ... -3
PT 42 S2 -4 S4 -6
PT 43 S2 -8 S3 ... -2
PT 58 S1 -2 ...PT 72 S2 Q12 NA QuestionI am confused about the word “generally” in the conclusion. **To Recap The argument form in Lawgic:** **P1**: Emotional Tendencies /(Changed) **…
I am confused about the word “generally” in the conclusion.
**To Recap The argument form in Lawgic:**
**P1**: Emotional Tendencies /(Changed)
**Required Premise**: Emotional Tendencies /(Changed)-> Generally /(Able to choose ...PTJ07.S2.Q8-- proponents of the electric carHi, Based on all the discussion online, this question seems to be very infamous, so anybody who can help me here would be a genius. I was stuc…
Hi,
Based on all the discussion online, this question seems to be very infamous, so anybody who can help me here would be a genius.
I was stuck between A and E here-- they both looked so good, so I ended up sticking with E ( ...PT 2 S2 Question 4 Can I infer some people are -P from the statement that most people are P?Can I infer some are -P from the statement that most people are P? I think saying most people are mortal does not mean some people are immortal, but …
Can I infer some are -P from the statement that most people are P? I think saying most people are mortal does not mean some people are immortal, but the correct AC of this question seems to suggest the otherwise. Is this a bad LR question?PT 18.S2.Q2Hey fellow 7Sagers, I'm having some trouble understanding this question. Here is how I diagrammed it: CR ----->/LW SRO---->LW (and th…
Hey fellow 7Sagers,
I'm having some trouble understanding this question.
Here is how I diagrammed it:
CR ----->/LW
SRO---->LW
(and then I diagrammed the last premise)
L CR
...HELP I can't understand this question no matter where I look.If someone could help me with this question and show why every AC is wrong and why the right one is right it would be very helpful. PT 2 S2 Questio…
... be very helpful.
PT 2 S2 Question 11
"If the ...Embedded conditional helpHi. I need help with something. I know how embedded conditionals work. For example A---> (B---->C) then it becomes A and B ----->C But what hap…
... ;B. Its a question from PT 74 S2 Q24. Its really tripping ...PT 21.S2.Q15 - Setting executives salariesI don't understand how executives from other companies setting salaries higher could have an impact on the salaries of executives from other companie…
I don't understand how executives from other companies setting salaries higher could have an impact on the salaries of executives from other companies?
**Admin Note:** https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-21-section-2-question-15/PT M20.S2.G3For game three, do ya'll just brute force your way through? Or is there something I'm missing?
For game three, do ya'll just brute force your way through? Or is there something I'm missing?How to answer "substituted condition" question? explanation video?I need help with trying to answer the questions that ask something along the lines of "Which of following could substitute the condition (insert rule…
I need help with trying to answer the questions that ask something along the lines of "Which of following could substitute the condition (insert rule here)"? I don't know how to approach these at all.
Example: PT M20.S2.Q11
