Consider this chain: A —> B—> /C or /D
I ... If B, then "C not D, or D not C, or Not C not ... require triggering the negation of B?
If I'm ... B?
In my mind, negating B requires BOTH Not C ... on, if I have B? In out questions require ...
... a rule 6 situation where B goes to A and C goes to A, but B ... also goes to D and E goes to C ... of the rule 6 group (A, B, C)? Do you also take the ...
... two concepts are "No A is B" and "C is both D and ... words, the conditional statements (A -> /B) and (C -> D and E ... up looking like this: /(A->/B) -> (C -> D and E ... aB, then Cs are always Ds and Es.
... , if C is out, then we know B is out and A is ... for A ---> B, but failing the sufficient condition for B---> C. What ... does this mean? Well, it means A and B ... are out, and C is a floater.
... of 15 1. Always, Together, Never apart A ←→B – [always go ... />
A→ (B→C)
/A or (B→C)
/A or (/B or /C)
(/A or /B) or C
NOT [/A ... />
• Revisited: Element of Lawgic 1). → = arrow, implies
2). / = ...
... you basically just have A-->B-->C, a logical argument. You're ... not providing a missing sufficient assumption ... says we need to provide a sufficient assumption that is not ...