I am confused about the word “generally” in the conclusion.
**To Recap The argument form in Lawgic:**
**P1**: Emotional Tendencies /(Changed)
**Required Premise**: Emotional Tendencies /(Changed)-> Generally /(Able to choose ...
Can I infer some are -P from the statement that most people are P? I think saying most people are mortal does not mean some people are immortal, but the correct AC of this question seems to suggest the otherwise. Is this a bad LR question?
I don't understand how executives from other companies setting salaries higher could have an impact on the salaries of executives from other companies?
I need help with trying to answer the questions that ask something along the lines of "Which of following could substitute the condition (insert rule here)"? I don't know how to approach these at all.
After reading this stimulus, I thought the author was assuming the dire wolves were trapped in the tar pits while hunting and scavenging. Is that correct? I was confused about the use of language in answer choice D; what does most frequently actually mean? ...
I was confused between answer choices A and E for this one.
Is A incorrect because it leaves out the part about researchers being puzzled by how kinglets are able to survive cold winter nights? I was trying to figure out if answer choice A ...
PT 77 Game 3: historical precursor ... PT 34 Game 2 (the latter ... precursor PTC Game 4 PT 79 Game 4: historical precursor PT 6 ... Game 4 and PT 40 Game 3 ...
... in my estimation:
#1. PT 36 Game 3: in my ... prepare for.
#3.PT 27 Game 2: snake and ... is a combo, in combination PT 57 Game 3 and then ... a Set as a whole: PTC is the hardest set of ... .