I understand that any choice proving that the murder rate would've been higher is correct, but I'm not understanding the connection between healthcare and assault victims. How is that relevant and what does it imply?
When I do Necessary Assumption Question, I prefer to negate the Answer Choice and then test whether the argument becomes invalid. But this question confused me. Can anybody help me explain the question by negating and testing?
I got this question wrong on the first try and on the blind review by choosing C.
After a closer look, I understand why E is the correct answer. For those that selected E on the first try, can you help me understand why you eliminated C? < ...
@goingfor99th PT 33 S3Q18 AC, E. It could be wrong for other reasons. But in the LSAT TRAINER he says that saying what we ought to do is a different conclusion
Hey! Just browsing LR forum posts and saw no one responded to this. I wrote an explanation here: https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/26042/pt-1-s3-q18-please-help