I'm not sure that I understand why C is right and E is not. It seems to me even though E is not a "good" answer because consultants advice only didn't lead to good outcomes "at first," but it's still a negative outcome based on their ...
I'm struggling to see how the "substantial" in answer choice D is justified. This AC does match the passage best when compared to the other choices, but it seems a little too strong to assume.
The question asks what's the function of the a ...
The conclusion reached above depends on which one
of the following assumptions?
(A)
(B)
(C)
(D)
(E)
The pre-Columbian inhabitants of Mexico
played games on all ceremonial occasions.
The making ...
Why would A not be correct for this? Is it not true that a society with laws have crimes (SL -> C), since the stimulus establishes that a society with no laws has no crimes (/SL -> /C). Why would D be a more correct answer? Why does the "some" part ...
As for AC A, I think I understand that AC A meets the target by introducing a third party, stress, that could be responsible for causing both snoring and smoking. However, I am wondering that what if stress ...
I don't understand the correct answer at all. I don't see how it could possibly be correct. I chose C which looked like the absolute only correct option.
I don't understand how you would go about this question because all of the answer choices sound bad. Why would A be the answer? Is it because you're pointing out a potential alternate cause?
I have not seen MP questions that begin with a question at the beginning before this one. I got it incorrect since I put B thinking the conclusion came after the word "Certainly" I am not sure how to get to the conclusion in this stimilus.
Stim: Japan is model for such sort of training effort & nothing is implicated about its economy
=>which makes ACs (B) and (C) to quickly be eliminated
(A) - worldwide shortage? who cares? irrelevant
(E) - ??? nothing is implied ...
Need help in explaining why (A) and (D) is wrong.
I understand that we need to strengthen the argument that the firm's need to reduce the tests on live animals and therefore use new tests: cultures of human cells.