In my opinion, this is the hardest question on PT 58. I missed it because I didn't understand what B was saying. Can someone help me translate it/evaluate my translation of B into English? Here is my breakdown for this one:
Hi all, I'm trying to better understand Flaw-Descriptive Weakening Questions and this one stumped me. After listening to the explanation, I better understand why AC C is correct. However, I am wondering if AC C would still hold up if the wording was ...
Hey everyone. After much contemplation, I needed some clarification for this one.
(E) says the “province could keep its workers and use them more effectively, with a resulting savings of $600 million in its out-of-province expenditures.” I ...
Purpose of proving grounds: Designed to be so demanding that only those students most committed to being science majors will receive passing grades in these courses.
C: Designing introductory science courses to serve as proving grounds has ...
Pretty clueless on this one. I narrowed the answer to B or C during the exam, and I couldn't do any better during BR. Turns out, the answer is E :/ Can someone break down all of the answer choices? Even though I got rid of A and D, I'm not convinced ...
Can someone please explain to me why A is the correct answer but all others are wrong. I initially chose C, and I don't see how it's wrong.
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-58-section-4-question-03/
I am having a hard time understanding why E is correct while B is incorrect. Can someone help me understand this logic or frame of thought? Thank you
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-58-section-4-question-19/
This question went completely over my head and I still don't understand why the correct answer is (C) for all the tea in China. If someone could please explain this question it would be greatly appreciated!
I get why (E) is the answer here, there's a flaw between the premise and sub-conclusion. Just because a majority are unaware doesn't necessarily mean they disprove of the attempt.
But I'm having a tough time eliminating (D). If we just isolate the ...
This was pretty tricky, and I got it right, but I still don’t have a good understanding of what is technically wrong with A. How is answer choice A not directly contradicting one of P’s premises? It must not because it isn’t the right answer choice. ...
Hello 7sagers, does anyone have any idea how to get the correct answer of question 20 of the second section of logical reasoning from dec 15 lsat? Trying to diagram out the conditionals and am struggling. My tutor couldn't even figure out this question.... ...
I chose B because I thought it weakened the argument showing that it does not matter the amount a person digesting the fiber thus weakening Kyra's claim.
Can someone explain A and B to me?
C) being economical and readily available ...
Looking to get a better idea of the logic on answer choice E, which is an incorrect answer choice.
I understand that A is the correct choice because reasoning from an ...
Link to the lesson: https://7sage.com/lesson/traffic-accident-principle-question?ss_completed_lesson=1135
First of all, C can be eliminated because of sequence: car stolen a week before the suggested actions were published. ...
Okay, BR-group people, don't get at me for this one (though I won't blame you if you do)... but I missed this question in my personal blind review, which was before the 4/23 BR group and didn't catch it until afterwards. I initially selected "A" but ...
I had a small hiccup with this redo and it cost me a point. I thought that the antibiotic has the option of one, two or three in, not 2 max since the first rule is conditional. If I put three in antibiotic, one in dietary regimen, ...
This is a sufficient assumption question but one of the forums I read to understand answer choice (A) explained that NEGATING (A) would demonstrate it to be a sufficient assumption. I totally see that negating (A) would weaken the argument, but I thought ...