HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt17 | 54 | 73 |
| s2 | 1.1K | 1.6K |
| 25 | 2.9K | 3.8K |
-
PT13.S2.Q7 - It is not correct that people of the USHey, yall! Would you say that AC B equals ambiguity? Sometimes I get equivocation and ambiguity mixed up but I eliminated equivocation here because "…
Hey, yall! Would you say that AC B equals ambiguity? Sometimes I get equivocation and ambiguity mixed up but I eliminated equivocation here because "tax" isn't used differently throughout the passages. B basically says the author extended the meaning of ... -
September Study Group | PT 54 | Sunday, June 25 @ 7p EDT / 6p CST / 4p PST ###Test Details: **PT:** 54 **Experimental Section:** LR#1 From PT58 **Question review form :** https://zach191.typeform.com/to/dblQhM Al…
###Test Details:
**PT:** 54
**Experimental Section:** LR#1 From PT58
**Question review form :** https://zach191.typeform.com/to/dblQhM
Also worth noting - I am including the experimental section in the ... -
PT73.S2.Q20Hi guys! I wanted to get some clarification on the logic that makes this answer E rather than D. The stem is that the argument relies on the assum…
Hi guys! I wanted to get some clarification on the logic that makes this answer E rather than D.
The stem is that the argument relies on the assumption, but my current understanding is that neither answer accomplishes this, though E has more ... -
Help with LR drillingHello everyone, I am in the process of drilling 1-2 LR sections per day from PT's 1-35 and am having some issues. I seem to be going right around…
... be going right around 20/25 on most sections and was ... -
PT June 2007.S2.Q22 - editorialist: news mediaSharing this because while eliminating AC E, I was forced to question the difference between causation and sufficiency as well as the danger of using…
Sharing this because while eliminating AC E, I was forced to question the difference between causation and sufficiency as well as the danger of using Lawgic as shorthand when you're not actually dealing with conditional statements.
Most ... -
PT68.S2.Q15 - psychologists recently conductedHi, I BR-ed this question, read the explanations from various websites and sources, and this question is still not making much sense to me. The …
Hi, I BR-ed this question, read the explanations from various websites and sources, and this question is still not making much sense to me.
The correct choice D has "probably" in it, which when negated is "not likely." Doesn't "not likely" ... -
"Mathy" Questions drilling?Sharing this in hopes that it might be useful to some: In an effort to feel more comfortable with "mathy" questions (involving proportions, percen…
... - percent
PT02.S2.Q04 - average
PT02.S2.Q14 - average
PT02.S2.Q16-17 - percent ... -
PT15.S2.Q17 - Most people believe that yawningHi, I understand that answer choice D is correct, but I have been struggling for quite a bit on eliminating answer choice B. Can anyone explain wh…
Hi,
I understand that answer choice D is correct, but I have been struggling for quite a bit on eliminating answer choice B. Can anyone explain why this is incorrect?
When I was doing this question, I noticed two errors in ... -
PT9.S2.Q23 - a poor farmer was fond ofThe negation of poor is not poor. The question assumes that you are either rich or else poor. What about the middle class?
The negation of poor is not poor. The question assumes that you are either rich or else poor. What about the middle class? -
PT61.S2.Q24 - historian: it is unlikely that someoneHey everyone, So question 24 in section 2 of Prep Test 61. This question I've been trying to grapple with for 3 days (seriously). I understand h…
Hey everyone,
So question 24 in section 2 of Prep Test 61.
This question I've been trying to grapple with for 3 days (seriously). I understand how conditionals work, but this question just doesn't work for me no matter how many times ... -
Should I retake?So, I'm faced with a dilemma. I scored a 169 on the June LSAT but I really badly wanted a 170+ on my exam. My 169 is nice because it still puts me in…
... (ugh), -1 LR (25/26), -3 LR (22/25), and -0 LG ... -
PT55.S2.P2(Q09) & PT55.S2.P4(Q23)Hi all, Having trouble with 2 questions in pretest 55, and I'd love to get some further explanation if anyone would be so kind! In the second p…
Hi all,
Having trouble with 2 questions in pretest 55, and I'd love to get some further explanation if anyone would be so kind!
In the second passage(s) in RC, for question #9, I chose C. Is this wrong because of the "most"; I ... -
Retake 161Hi all! I want to start by saying thank you for welcoming me into this great 7Sage community. I just took the June LSAT, and after consistently PTi…
... into law schools ranked #7-#25 ish, ideally with funding. I ... -
PT19.S2.Q18 - in the past decadeCan someone please breakdown this question for me?? https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-19-section-2-question-18/
Can someone please breakdown this question for me??
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-19-section-2-question-18/ -
Digital LSAT Round IILSAC just announced another digital LSAT field test. **Date** : October 14, 2017 **Application Period** : July 17-August 25 Instead of the $…
... /> **Application Period** : July 17-August 25
Instead of the ... -
Too old?Hey guys, I'm 25 years old and have been studying for the LSAT well over two years on and off. I've sat in the exam 3 times already and my scores …
... guys,
I'm 25 years old and have been ... -
Back to the Drawing Board...Hi 7sage! After spending the last 3 months or so focusing intensely on LR and RC and making great improvements... I feel like I lost some of the m…
... I fool-proofed PTs 1-25 and now am having similar ... me difficulty from 1-25 and will foolproof 25-35 in the ... -
PT21.S2.Q19 - spectroscopic analysis has revealed - super hard NA q.Hello, This is an NA question that I have been trying to grasp. It's REALLY hard. I will explain how I can justify the to myself and I would be…
Hello,
This is an NA question that I have been trying to grasp. It's REALLY hard.
I will explain how I can justify the to myself and I would be so grateful if anyone wants to chime in and add any additional analysis.
< ... -
PT17.S4.Q14 (P2) - legal cases can be termed "hard"Hello, I came across a puzzling question while I was answering this reading comprehension question. Just to be clear, my question is more a quest…
Hello,
I came across a puzzling question while I was answering this reading comprehension question. Just to be clear, my question is more a question on formal logic than that of reading comprehension. I was wondering if the following two ... -
PT3.S2.Q25 - the public in the united statesI can't see why E is a better AC that D. Any thoughts? Flaw Argument Summary: Context: The presence of X has conditioned the US to support a …
I can't see why E is a better AC that D. Any thoughts?
Flaw
Argument Summary:
Context: The presence of X has conditioned the US to support a substantial defense budget.
Premise 1: X is gone.
Conclusion: ... -
Analytics QuestionWhen scoring a test that has a question labelled as *Item removed from scoring* do we leave it empty when inputting our answers? Does the analytics t…
... section was originally out of 25 questions and there is an ... -
PT12.S2.Q7 (G2) - five childrenSo I didn't do so well on this game because I played the children multiple times because it didn't say that they had to be played exactly once, so sh…
So I didn't do so well on this game because I played the children multiple times because it didn't say that they had to be played exactly once, so should we assume that they need to be played at least once unless stated otherwise? Thank you!!! -
PT9.S4.Q17 - the group of works exhibitedI have an issue with B. The stimulus stated that an equal number of painters, sculptures and photographers entered, how then, can we conclude that th…
... or rich can afford the $25 fee? nevertheless, and equal number ... -
Random Drop in Score - Outlier???Someone please please tell me this is just an anomaly and that everything is going to be okay lol (seriously freaking out here) I scored a 157 to…
... I got 16/25 on one and 20/25 on the other ... -
Feeling Discouraged... Again.Hey everyone, hope your studies are going well! On my last two recent prep-tests I received a score of 156 on PT 65 (with a 178 BR), and then 161 …
... and fool-proofing) from PTs 25-35? Or do you think ... -
PT44.S2.Q20 - research indicatesSo i see why AC (B) demolishes the argument and is clearly the correct AC. But does AC (A) weaken it as well? https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/l…
So i see why AC (B) demolishes the argument and is clearly the correct AC. But does AC (A) weaken it as well?
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-44-section-2-question-20/ -
PT77.S2.Q18 - historian: those who claimI eliminated answer choice D because it says, "fails to exclude...." As I see it, answer choice D would perfectly address the flaw in the argument if…
I eliminated answer choice D because it says, "fails to exclude...." As I see it, answer choice D would perfectly address the flaw in the argument if it said something like, "excludes the possibility..." or "fails to consider the possibility...." Am I ... -
When to watch JY's explanations?After BR a LR section, how do you decide when it's helpful to watch JY's video explanation? I think I might be over killing it right now. I'm prob…
... for about 18 of the 25 LR questions. Perhaps it's ... -
PT72.S2.Q16 - many great art worksIm in the middle of BRing and i like AC E bc how does the author know that having so much artwork that can satisfy every taste imaginable will affect…
Im in the middle of BRing and i like AC E bc how does the author know that having so much artwork that can satisfy every taste imaginable will affect someones aesthetic fulfilment.
But AC D... does the author have to assume there is such a scenario? ...
