HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt21 | 45 | 50 |
| s4 | 1K | 1.3K |
| q26 | 49 | 56 |
-
Need Help with MSS v. Strengthen, v. Correlation/Causation StrengthenI am stuck on some of the MSS questions, Weaken, and the difference with how to tell MSS and Strengthen apart especially when C/C Strengthen is in pl…
... question in here, but PT19, S4, Q12 was one that I ... -
Why I am now a fan of the Digital LSATLet me be honest, hearing the word digital next to the word LSAT is daunting. So I took on the brave journey, drove 4 hours and took the 5 hours Digi…
... , 15 minutes between s3 and s4. It was nice that the ... -
Intermediate conclusionsI'm having trouble differentiating the IC from the premises and I don't like IC questions in general...if something leads to a conclusion then it mak…
... . An example is PT 30 S4 Q13. The subsidiary(intermediate) conclusion ... -
Flaw conundrumSo as I am going about my studying I am finding that flaw questions are particularly hard for me. I have noticed a pattern though. I get roughly 60% …
... sets.
For example, PT50.S4.Q9 is a PSA question ... -
Necessary and Sufficient Answer Choices in the Same QuestionCan someone point me to LSAT LR q's that are either necessary or sufficient questions types that list BOTH a necessary and sufficient answer choice? …
I think PT49 S4 Q16 does it...
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-49-section-4-question-16/ -
Mislabeled as SA in Question Bank?In the Question Bank and in the LR Drill Sets (https://7sage.com/lesson/lr-drills-preptest-01-to-09/ ), **PT8.S4.Q21**. is categorized as a Sufficien…
... was a discussion about PT8.S4.Q21. (https://7sage.com/discussion ... -
Mislabeled as SA in Question Bank?In the Question Bank and in the LR Drill Sets (https://7sage.com/lesson/lr-drills-preptest-01-to-09/ ), **PT8.S4.Q21**. is categorized as a Sufficien…
Thanks! PT8.S4.Q21 has been changed from the incorrect SA label to the correct NA label. -
"Mathy" Questions drilling?Sharing this in hopes that it might be useful to some: In an effort to feel more comfortable with "mathy" questions (involving proportions, percen…
... (overgeneralization)
PT 50, S4, #22 (36)
PT ... 291) (MBT)
PT 27, S4, #14 (312) (MBT)
PT 30, S4, #22 (76) (MSS)
PT 54, S4, #24 (37)
PT 49, S4, #24 (36) (flawed)
... -
"if all and only those" -- biconditional?Hello, I was working on PT35.S4.Q11, and came across the expression "if all and only those", and it seemed to me as a biconditional indicator, bu…
... the explanation video of PT35.S4.Q11, J.Y. explains this ... -
PT7.S1.Q10 - a large group of hyperactive childrenI'd love an explanation on this one! Thanks in advance
... as "the Dramamine question"), PT25.S4.Q24, PT55.S3.Q9, PT57 ... -
Translation of "derive solely from"I have a question regarding a logical translation of "derive solely from." This is from the answer choice (D) in PT62.S4.Q15. https://7sage.com/lsat_…
... @LSATcantwin !
But PT62.S4.Q15 is a PSA question ... -
PT22.S4.Q19 - contemporary business firmsI could not find anything to prove the conclusion > few people understand current events> and did not see the flaw the LSAT makers identified. He…
Hey, I think you mis-numbered the question. PT22, S4, Q19 is a weakening question on the Iron Law of Responsibility.
Could you provide us with the right question number so we could help you out? -
Weakening questions - a strategy for harder questions?Yesterday I had the privilege of working through a problem with J.Y. It’s in here if you are curious; https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/1…
... get further clarification for PT82.S4.Q14 ?
I've been ... -
DeleteDelete
... of one another (i.e. S4, Q3). When you have a ... -
Confusing Bi-Conditional vs. Not Both in LGHi all, I saw a 7sager already posted a similar question (see https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/13716), but I'm less confused about what h…
... />
J.Y. treated PT24 S4 Game 1 (https://7sage.com ... -
Confusing Bi-Conditional vs. Not Both in LGHi all, I saw a 7sager already posted a similar question (see https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/13716), but I'm less confused about what h…
... /> > J.Y. treated PT24 S4 Game 1 (https://7sage.com ... -
Confusing Bi-Conditional vs. Not Both in LGHi all, I saw a 7sager already posted a similar question (see https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/13716), but I'm less confused about what h…
... ; > J.Y. treated PT24 S4 Game 1 (https://7sage.com ... -
Confusing Bi-Conditional vs. Not Both in LGHi all, I saw a 7sager already posted a similar question (see https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/13716), but I'm less confused about what h…
... /> > J.Y. treated PT24 S4 Game 1 (https://7sage.com ... -
Confusing Bi-Conditional vs. Not Both in LGHi all, I saw a 7sager already posted a similar question (see https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/13716), but I'm less confused about what h…
... ; > J.Y. treated PT24 S4 Game 1 (https://7sage.com ... -
Confusing Bi-Conditional vs. Not Both in LGHi all, I saw a 7sager already posted a similar question (see https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/13716), but I'm less confused about what h…
... ; > J.Y. treated PT24 S4 Game 1 (https://7sage.com ... -
Referential phrase: "otherwise"<center>:warning: <font color="red">**This post contains spoilers to PT80.S4.Q15**</font> :warning:</center> I had trouble parsing out the stimulu…
... in LG; for example, PT55.S4.Game 4's last rule ... -
RedactedRedacted
... involved flawed reasoning (e.g. S4.LR1) and were justified as ... -
LR: You will choose to buy something vs. You will buy somethingHi 7sagers, Is there a difference in the meaning of the statements below? If you see the desk, you will choose to buy the desk. If you see the…
... in the stimulus of PT18/S4/Q7. The last sentence is ...
