Hello! I didn't see any prior discussions on this question, and it's confusing me a bit so I wanted to get some outside opinions!
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-29-section-4-question-17/
So I'm currently drilling NA question types through the Cambridge packet things. I'm looking at question 20 in section 1 of PT 36, and it says its an NA question type.
I've watched the explanation for this video...but one of the conditional statements still has me confused. Basically, J.Y combined a /J and a J, to make a conditional chain...can someone take a look at this video and break it down?
I came across a puzzling question while I was answering this reading comprehension question. Just to be clear, my question is more a question on formal logic than that of reading comprehension. I was wondering if the following two ...
So I see that the live commentary for S4 is up for June 17 test. I am wondering when the PrepTest will be available to take on 7sage. I have Ultimate+. Thanks!
I have an issue with B. The stimulus stated that an equal number of painters, sculptures and photographers entered, how then, can we conclude that the increased price had any impact on which art gets exhibited? since the overall submissions were equal for ...
So i see why AC (B) demolishes the argument and is clearly the correct AC. But does AC (A) weaken it as well?
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-44-section-2-question-20/
Questions like these are tougher for me to find guidance when I am stuck since there are not videos or explanations for them. So can anyone please help me understand why C was the answer and not D.
Hi guys! I wanted to get some feedback on this RC question.
The prompt asks for the main idea and the right answer is that 'the views of ecologists and economic growth advocates have only recently become polarized.'
I have a question on how I am supposed to read a certain rule in sequencing games. The fifth rule in this game states: Each rock classic is immediately preceded on the CD by a new composition. I wrote it out as [ R -> NR ]
...
So for this one I was having a lot of trouble because I couldn't see how any of the answers could be true based off the stimulus. Can someone explain this question to me please? Ty!
Would anyone be willing to walk me through this one? I just can't step back enough to see it clearly and feel certain I understand (and I don't have access to the explanation video). Thank you!
Either my brain is fried or im thick as a rock bc i cannot put into words why C is correct.
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-79-section-4-question-21/
I am having trouble understanding why answer choice A is a necessary assumption. I eliminated this answer choice because of the word ANY. I think it may be due to how I negated this answer choice, focusing of the "quantity" and not on the word "work well ...
A great grouping game with conditional logic, but I am having some trouble...
I am having trouble understanding how to link up the new condition in this question. I understand what JY is saying in the explanation video and it makes sense but ...
Are we supposed to assume that these chemicals are initially "harmless" or that the dilution process caused them to become harmless? There is nothing in the passage discussing whether or not the chemicals are harmless.