When I read the question I assumed that the debris hurled into the atmosphere causing the blocking of the sun and extinction of the dinosaurs was only in the Yucatan Peninsula. Which is why answer choice B was attractive and I picked it rather than answer ...
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-33-section-1-question-22/
Can anyone help me restate option B to better understand what it really says? I can't find anything that helps me understand this question.
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-33-section-1-question-21/
I was watching the PSA webinar and I had a question about answer choice C. I initially eliminated C because of "every". I was looking for something closer to what was mentioned in ...
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-33-section-1-question-11/
I got my answer right for this question. But in JY's explanation, he explained the meaning of the last sentence as: # of people who consume Caffeine is GREATER OR EQUAL to # of ...
So this question was an oddball for me. I know it's something we've seen before where we are given a principle/rules/whatever and we have to apply it to given situations. I normally do a fairly decent job of keeping track of all the "rules" in my head but ...
Hi all I am a bit confused about the sufficient and necessary condition for (C).
According to JY, (C) should be interpreted as "**no[Physically addictive --> psychoactive]**" , but shouldn't the relative clause "**to which people can become ...
Hello 7sage community! This is my first time posting here but I've been reading the forum for quite some time. I'm posting as I have a question from prep test 53 (https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-53-section-1-question-09/). I'm wondering why ...
I don't understand how A can be the answer.
A says "no evidence in favor of a hypothesis," but the proponents of the hypothesis is giving us evidence. He explains the fossil thing etc how come this doesn't count as evidence backing up his claim? < ...
This was a weird question because while A,B,C, and E all looked wrong, D looked ok but I just couldn't quite 100% understand why D was right. How were we supposed to know where demagogues place on the legitimate/illegitimate spectrum? Why is D right?
I am really struggling with this question and I honestly think it's because I may have misunderstood the stimulus. My understanding is that milk, the final product that we see at the store, requires the use of a bottle and raw milk. The bottler is the ...
To attack the premise or not to attack the premise
I keep hearing over and over again that I'm not supposed to attack the premise but this question from the weakening portion of LR seems to do just that. Doesn't answer choice D attack the ...
So this particular question has about 8 years worth of comments and about as much time's worth of confusion regarding why D weakens the argument because it seems to be attacking a premise, namely the one stating that these painters have to eat sea animals ...
#Help
Can anyone explain to me how A is correct? I don't see the idea of a "comprehensive approach" being discussed in the passage. From my understanding, the passage is letting us know that the current approach - the piecemeal approach - is not ...
I was hoping to get some help with J.Y's reasoning in one of the explanations videos. According to J.Y., the statement "as many people consume caffeine as consume any one of the other addictive psychoactive substances" means that ...
Potatoes -> has solanine (poisonous in large quantities) -most-> solanine in the skin.
Domestic potatoes -> has small quantities (so not poisonous)
Wild potatoes -> poisonous level of solanine (must be in large number).
So ...
Can someone help me understand how we can infer [A]? It says that officers deviating from cognitive interview techniques is problematic because it might make the cognitive interview less effective. I eliminated it because although the author suggests that ...