http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-32-section-1-question-20/
This question asks which of following answer choice will strength the conclusion EXCEPT.
The conclusion is that the current map used to show where different types of garden ...
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-41-section-1-question-07/
Can someone explain to me how they arrived at the correct answer using their process?
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-20-section-1-question-20/
I got this question correct since C was obviously not relevant to the argument, but during BR, I can't seem to eliminate B or E. Why are these necessary assumptions? Here is my ...
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-41-section-1-question-09/
Hi, while solving MSS questions, I often confront the situation in which whether I should use logical translation or not.
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-41-section-1-question-08/
I was trying to find out what's the difference between C and D, but I still don't understand why C can't be an answer.
If there're no predators which pose a danger to ...
I really don't understand why C is incorrect.
I think "there is another explanation~~" can match "since parthenogenesis is~" part in the stimulus.
Why is C incorrect and A an answer?
In real time, I was down between B and D. I chose D because it "felt" correct.
In regards to actual reasoning, I'm assuming D's appeal to authority is illegitimate because something like smell is so subjective and appealing to an expert ...
Can someone explain why B is correct for this question? I find this question confusing, mostly because the way the prompt asks for a principle that if established will prove both sides of the argument correct.
Hi could someone help me out with the diagramming on this one? I found it absolutely confounding and I'm usually pretty decent at conditional phrasing.
So what I took away from this after looking at this thoroughly was that the original ...
So I'm currently drilling NA question types through the Cambridge packet things. I'm looking at question 20 in section 1 of PT 36, and it says its an NA question type.
So for this one I was having a lot of trouble because I couldn't see how any of the answers could be true based off the stimulus. Can someone explain this question to me please? Ty!
Can somebody explain to me why answer choice (b) is the correct answer? I can't understand how renovating the houses would be the choice that precludes the possibility of trying the other approach. Isn't it the other way around with demolition?
Hello!
This NA question is causing my blood pressure to rise.
I have trouble accepting E).
Negating E) doesn't destroy the argument. It's okay if medicine DOES reduce stress, as long as it isn't ONLY reducing stress. Maybe it reduces ...
With tough questions like this - I almost always double check line 1 with the conclusion at the end, because there is always this jump that somehow (or a lot of time is the fall)... routinely with ...
When I was looking at the answer choices of this question, I was stuck between B, C, and E. Can anyone help explain why B is right and why C and E are wrong?
Is the reasoning flaw in the stimulus that it concludes what makes something not censorship from the sufficient condition for censorship?
If A or B, then Censorship exists.
From this, we cannot conclude that censorship does not exist.
How did you rule out Answer Choice "C"? Some folks mentioned, the AC gives only "what's valued" and that doesn't constitute a resolution. What if, people got better at being ambidextrous as they grew older and that's why the % of LH Population drops as you ...
To attack the premise or not to attack the premise
I keep hearing over and over again that I'm not supposed to attack the premise but this question from the weakening portion of LR seems to do just that. Doesn't answer choice D attack the ...
My issue is in the the stimulus finding the conclusion. Can Someone please help?
**Admin note: edited title; please use the format of "PT#.S#.Q# - [brief description]"**
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-41-section-1-question- ...
Hi! Can any one explain how they approached this parallel flaw question about perception? JY tries mapping but it would take me a long time to do and I am trying to see if there's something about the structure of the stimulus that can be used to get to the ...
So this particular question has about 8 years worth of comments and about as much time's worth of confusion regarding why D weakens the argument because it seems to be attacking a premise, namely the one stating that these painters have to eat sea animals ...