http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-41-section-1-question-07/
Can someone explain to me how they arrived at the correct answer using their process?
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-41-section-1-question-09/
Hi, while solving MSS questions, I often confront the situation in which whether I should use logical translation or not.
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-41-section-1-question-08/
I was trying to find out what's the difference between C and D, but I still don't understand why C can't be an answer.
If there're no predators which pose a danger to ...
I still don't understand why answer choice E is wrong. My understanding is, iIf stress is a symptom of a weakened immune system, then wouldn't that mean that symptoms such as stress then lead to or cause the weakened immune system?
Can someone please help me comprehend why "reducing stress can help weakened immune system" is same as "stress can weaken the immune system" ? It seems like invalid negation to me...
With tough questions like this - I almost always double check line 1 with the conclusion at the end, because there is always this jump that somehow (or a lot of time is the fall)... routinely with ...
The answer for this question is B. I understand why B is right, but I was not able to fully eliminate why D is wrong (I understand why A, C, and E are wrong). The reason why I am still not sure why D is wrong is because D states that, ...
In this passage, I picked D because I interpreted Rito using the phrase "serious underestimates" as the severity of the underestimate of the raw numbers, while Hiro uses “surely underestimate” as an acceptance that there is an underestimate but not ...
Could someone help me ID what flaw is in the stimulus and why answer choice D is wrong? Is D incorrect because the skeptic is assuming Debbie used another technique aside from the three he was originally testing for? And is the sleight of hand, trick deck, ...
My issue is in the the stimulus finding the conclusion. Can Someone please help?
**Admin note: edited title; please use the format of "PT#.S#.Q# - [brief description]"**
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-41-section-1-question- ...
Hi! Can any one explain how they approached this parallel flaw question about perception? JY tries mapping but it would take me a long time to do and I am trying to see if there's something about the structure of the stimulus that can be used to get to the ...
The rule is "Either P is an ingredient or Y is an ingredient, but not both." It's easy enough to see that both of them cannot be in, but does this rule mandate that AT LEAST one of them is in? If so, can you also point me to the lecture in the core ...
A is wrong because we cant say many old people as we dont know the definition of old for Rotelle. If she considers 60+ old or 80+ old.
B is wrong because it says people as old as Sims are the only those. There could be more people.
C is ...
... of stimulus" E.g. PT60.S1.Q7 (P4) - weakened immune system cancer ... question" E.g. PT40.S2.Q7 (G2) - could be true of ... of question" E.g. PT37.S1.Q12 - Political scientist: Efforts to ...
... of stimulus" E.g. PT60.S1.Q7 (P4) - weakened immune system cancer ... question" E.g. PT40.S2.Q7 (G2) - could be true of ... of question" E.g. PT37.S1.Q12 - Political scientist: Efforts to ...
... of stimulus" E.g. PT60.S1.Q7 (P4) - weakened immune system cancer ... question" E.g. PT40.S2.Q7 (G2) - could be true of ... of question" E.g. PT37.S1.Q12 - Political scientist: Efforts to ...
... of stimulus" E.g. PT60.S1.Q7 (P4) - weakened immune system cancer ... question" E.g. PT40.S2.Q7 (G2) - could be true of ... of question" E.g. PT37.S1.Q12 - Political scientist: Efforts to ...