HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt63 | 62 | 72 |
| s4 | 1K | 1.3K |
| q25 | 144 | 165 |
-
BR this Fri and SatHi folks, can you post here/message me if you are planning to join Fri and/or Sat? (73 and 63?) Last week I was the only one and I just wanted to mak…
@badgalriri http://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/4736/br-groups-week-of-oct-12th-weds-pt62-fri-pt73-sat-pt63 -
3 month PT schedule, any advice?Hey all -- I'm planning on taking the Feb test (though I'm not against pushing it to June). I've finished the Ultimate curriculum thoroughly, gone…
@megsvyas said:
I'll join for the next one, and take the PT in advance like I'm supposed to!
It's tomorrow :D @DumbHollywoodActor is it PT63? I plan to duck in for a bit on the call so I hope to "meet" you soon! -
PT 46 S4 Game 3 Question# 12<i>Hey 7Sagers, had someone email me with a question and I thought you guys could help out! Here it is:</i> I have a question or comment regar…
@"Dillon A. Wright" said:
Hey 7Sagers
I thought for a second Dillon had finally started studying for the LSAT for real!
I believe you still owe us some real-time logic games ... ;) -
Trying out something new... thoughts?Hello All: Quick preface: 1. I am taking the Dec. 2015 LSAT. 2. I started at 132 3. average PT score is 152/154 4. Target Score: ANYTHING over…
... at Q10, Q15, Q20, and Q25. Or every 10, whichever works ... -
Why are my questions not being answered?Why are my questions not being answered? People who posted later than me seem to get a response first, and this has happened to me on several occasio…
This question is from PT58.S4.Q19 (Oct. 2009)
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-58-section-4-question-19/ -
PT 77 explanationsIs there a ETA on these explanations (77 - Dec 2015) ? Read a post several weeks ago that they would most likely be out before Feb 2016 exam.
The S1 RC explanations are done and the S2 LR ones are in the oven. I'll likely get to S3 LG and the S4 LR next week. Fingers crossed! -
June Test Takers Group BR Schedule (updated)<img src="http://anticapitalists.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/lets-get-organized-3.jpg" > </center> My fellow June Test-takers! Please take…
... 5pm June LSAT BR Group PT63
Thurs Apr 14, 2016 ... -
PT77.S4.Q20 - selena claims to have psychic powersHello 7sagers, does anyone have any idea how to get the correct answer of question 20 of the second section of logical reasoning from dec 15 lsat? Tr…
I think you may be talking about Section four and not section two. S4 has the psychic power question:
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-77-section-4-question-20
Edited title to reflect that! -
Time Management Curriculum?So I just got to parallel questions in the curriculum, and as I begin working through some of these and time is becoming a more challenging factor th…
You can find JY doing LR in PT69 S1+S4, and PT71 S1+S3. And Jon also had an epic timed LR section video, which took him only 19 minutes. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F4vY0KpviJw&index=6&list=LLaknkMoRl59wmjfBX67-nFg -
PT35.S4.Q23 - older wiser tree ringsHi, coming here from the two comments in the explanations (https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-35-section-4-question-23/). I would really lik…
@dcdcdcdcdc said:
A is wrong because it could be that her daughter is just very wise at birth. Isn't this the same as saying a tree could just start off with a lot of rings?
Hi @dcdcdcdcdc
Yes, it is the same ... -
BR BluesOkay, so I am nearing completion on the core curriculum (woot woot!) and I would definitely say that I am starting to grasp these core concepts relat…
... . So weird!!!
PT29.S4.Q08: Here I am sure ... -
What is the negation of "not many"?How do you negate "not many"? To me, you can't just dropped the "not". Here's my thought process: "Not many" seems to be the same as "some not…
... the LSAT context. PT 62 S4 (towards the end, the film ... -
What is the negation of "not many"?How do you negate "not many"? To me, you can't just dropped the "not". Here's my thought process: "Not many" seems to be the same as "some not…
... />
An example is PT62 S4 Film Preservation question, in which ... -
What is the negation of "not many"?How do you negate "not many"? To me, you can't just dropped the "not". Here's my thought process: "Not many" seems to be the same as "some not…
... the question mentioned (PT 62, S4, Q23), the incorrect answer C ... -
PT19.S4.Q18 - politician: a government that taxeshttps://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-19-section-4-question-18/ I'm posing this question primarily because of answer choice A on PT19 S4 Q18. Ans…
... general format, for example, "PT19.S4.Q18 - Politician: A government that ... -
PT55.S1.Q25 - some twentieth-century art is greathttps://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-55-section-1-question-25/ All of the statements follow logically EXCEPT: A. Some influential art involv…
@montaha.rizeq said:
Pt55, section 1,q25
Thanks!
Text was pretty similar, so I edited it out and replaced it with the link. -
Where do you guys study?I'm curious as to whether or not it is worth investing in a desk/study space in my home. Wondering where you guys study for the LSAT? At home? or…
I prefer to study at home most of the time. Here is my desk set up where I study. Next to it is a pile of PTs, Cambridge Packets, and all the LSAT books I wasted tons of money on, lol. -
PT63.S1.Q19 - anthropologist: it was formerly believed thatHi, So I'm not sure about the correct answer C... Why do we have to assume or compare the ancestors to Neanderthals? Why it's required? Even thoug…
... sure you're looking at PT63.S3.Q19? The stem and ... -
PT27.S4.Q13 - historian: the ancient greeks failed to realizehttps://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-27-section-4-question-13/ <font color=red>Admin: Edited out passage because it was word for word. Please …
"democracy is No Improvement over monarchy" seems quite well to parallel "there is No Point in asking the club, yada yada".
@runiggyrun said:
I think that's why JY is identifying the "it is no less wrong" sentence as the conclusion ... -
Conditional Chains - need more practiceStruggled with the Conditional Chain exercise in the course. Would love additional practice - anyone know of additional practice materials? (Or, shou…
... -Game1 | PT48-Game1 | PT54-Game1 | PT63-Game1
The Difficult ... -
PT63.S1.Q14 -- You know those questions that make you rethink everything?This question came up on the last BR group call this Wednesday. I'm really curious what you all think about this question! I'd also love to know what…
@nessa.k13.0 said:
I wrote out a page --a love letter so to speak---for this question in an attempt to give myself the best chance of never making the same mistakes that I did on this question again.
This really is a great ... -
PT34.S4.G4 - each of exactly six doctorsHi All, I've been pretty good with setting up and reading conditional chains for in-and-out games but for some reason I'm really confused with th…
@CrushLSAT said:
question 19 (which asks for a complete and accurate list of doctors at Souderton) be E (N and P)? Why can't the ~N --> J pair be treated the same as ~O --> J? If we only have N and P, aren't we still good since we have at ... -
PT32.S4.Q08 - figorian wildlife commissionHey All, So this question is asking for the answer choice that would most strongly support the Development Commissioner's position. I cannot see h…
Hey B,
So first lets start with the question stem. It's asking us, which one of the following principles, if accepted (true), would most strongly support the Figorian Development Commission's position.
What we are looking for ... -
Chart skeptic's challenge: show me a game for which a chart definitely saves timeI've just gone through the "Grouping Games with a Chart" lessons, and for each of the four games -- two in the lessons and two in the problem set -- …
... into another example: PT 47 S4 G3 -- record stores and music ... -
PT72.S4.G1 - a radio station airs hourly news updatesA condition stated is "Within each segment, reports are ordered by length, from longest to shortest." For purposes of my question I'd like to emphasi…
@"steve-10" said:
The correct answer to Q1, the typical "acceptable configuration" question, implies T — W (where "—" is the usual notation indicating relative order).
Well, it does imply that T -- W is a possibility. T -- W ...
