I completely understand the argument core and the correct answer. However, upon review, I am confused with the way a Manhattan expert eliminates (A).
https://www. ...
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-64-section-1-question-22/
The following is my reasoning for why the answer to PT64S1Q22 is D, and is not B. The answer-sheet states that the answer is B, while online explanations for why the answer is B seem ...
I'm still confused as to how and why Jon's explanation in the video is used to express answer choice A is correct and answer choice C is wrong. I'm not following his logic in the video. Can somebody please explain this? Also there was a comment below the ...
This question is about an ethicist who says love refers to a feeling therefore a marital vow saying to love until death do us part is a promise that makes no sense because feelings are not within our control and a promise to do something not within one's ...
I dont understand why E is wrong...it says the citys mayor requested so they invested in computermodeling technology right?
if the mayor was not a proponet they would not request it...I thought. any ideas? :(
Is it bc of ...
I didn't understand the explanation for the right/wrong answer choices on this one at all. Can anyone help? I initially chose (C) on my PT and I still don't understand how that could be wrong, especially in contrast to answer (A).
@jac376 said:
Flaw: The correlation of Ra, C, and (C --> Rh) does not mean there is a causation from C to Ra. The answer which strengthens this argument will show that (Rh --> Ra) (C causes Ra because it causes Rh which causes Ra) or directly ...
... try to sign on at 8:15 EST tonight for BR ... we want to start at 8:30 SHARP (accommodating West Coasters ... actually on the call at 8:30 I will start talking ... />
And I do mean 8:30* SHARP ...