For LR clearly. When you see a question involves heavy Lawgic say MBT MBF Parallel reasoning etc.. Do you start mapping the lawgic right away or read it first then read it again and Map it out?
... . I took PT’s 1-3 so far and my scores ... />
After having taken PTs 1-3 so far, I feel as ... two (lol). So really my question is, from the experience of ...
This is a Necessary Assumption question. Could someone explain how Answer ... Assumption to a Necessary Assumption question. Negating Answer D (It's ... more appropriate to a SA question. In contrast, Answer B ... lsat_explanations/lsat-70-section-1-question-21/
... />
A. Go back to the question types I need most work ... , but given that I have 3 months left of full time ... and and plow thru 2-3 a week and rely on ...
Not all X are Y. Is this translated as X some (not)Y? Also, is Not all X are Y equivalent to X some Y? For the latter question, I know in English in certain contexts, the statement "not all" of something implies "some are."
... worked through every single LR question type drilling packet, and feel ... the questions I missed are question types that I had ... the Powerscore LG Bible, the question-type drilling packets, drilling many ...