From my memory, I think the correct answer is A.
As for your question regarding contrapositive, watch out for quantifiers such as some and most.
Remember what the lessons taught you: there are NO contrapositives for quantified statements.
... of 30
• Existential quantifiers are intersectional relationships. Some X ... amp; Necessary Condition)
• Existential quantifiers
Relationship – intersection instead of ... does NOT exist for EXISTENTIAL QUANTIFIERS
... 40
• Conditional Logic/Universal Quantifiers are very useful for many ... logic
Conditional Logic/ Universal Quantifiers
• Indicators
• Sufficient & ... about this notion of Universal Quantifiers, in short, this entire curriculum ...
... of 30
• Existential quantifiers are intersectional relationships. Some X ... amp; Necessary Condition)
• Existential quantifiers
Relationship – intersection instead of ... does NOT exist for EXISTENTIAL QUANTIFIERS
The valid argument forms and the existential quantifiers can appear anywhere on the LSAT, not only in particular types of questions. Sure, they may appear more frequently in certain types of questions, but it's not a hard and fast rule.
No, the modifiers/quantifiers are important. Are you paying attention to their synonymous interpretations? Majority=Most, some=a few=many=several, likely=most of the time, etc.
... attempt to contort natural language quantifiers, such as "most, many, more ... project because the universal/existential quantifiers ("all"/"some") of first-order ... syntactic behavior of all generalized quantifiers.
... attempt to contort natural language quantifiers, such as "most, ... because the universal/existential quantifiers ("all"/"some") of ... syntactic behavior of all generalized quantifiers.
... cards with all of the quantifiers and their translations on the ... the stimulus by identifying the quantifiers translating, chaining out, and linking ...