> @BinghamtonDave said:
> Is the rule you referenced on a game about appetizers and main dish recipes? Is the N "Nutmeg?" I think this might hold one of the keys to understanding the subtlety here.
... case scenario. Everyone has a section they are weakest on. Visualize ... test and saw RC for section 1. I literally (quietly) laughed ... get an experimental RC for section4. It helped relax me so ...
... going to focus on each section, and certain question types more ... 'd just do section after section, drill after drill, PT after PT, hoping for ...
... also suggest printing the section like an actual PT.
* Pick ... one LR and one RC section. Start ... stopwatch, and work through the section diligently. Try to work through ... 70 minutes to finish the section, then you need to stop ...
... that LR was your weakest section, so that is the one ... " said, start by taking a PT or two to see where ... had a really bad section of a low PT and needed some ...
... com/lsat_explanations/lsat-38-section-2-game-4/) where I present ... 7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-83-section-4-game-2/) with your ... 7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-61-section-3-game-2/), if ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-61-section-3-game-2/) (which ...
... Game 3 Game 4 Game 4
Day 2: PT 1 Game 1 ... , Game 2 Game 3, Game 3, Game 4 ... , Game 4.
and PT 2 Game 1 Game ... , this reflects missing questions on PT 1 Game 3 and Game ... also making some mistakes on PT 2's games.
... ), so a PT with a particularly, notoriously difficult section likely makes up ... for it with an easier section in ... the same PT and/or with ... with a high difficulty RC section, since that is my weakness ...
... ), so a PT with a particularly, notoriously difficult section likely makes up ... for it with an easier section in ... the same PT and/or with ... with a high difficulty RC section, since that is my weakness ...