HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| two | 16.1K | 20.5K |
| group | 7.6K | 12.6K |
| 1 | 27.2K | 41K |
| indicators | 675 | 955 |
| in | 105.9K | 244.5K |
| same | 19.7K | 23.6K |
| sentece | 1 | 2 |
-
[Ended] Live Lightning Consultations—Weds @ 9 pm EST<p>7Sagers,</p> <p>This <strong>Wednesday</strong>, at <strong>9 pm EST,</strong> I’ll do another round of <em>live lightning consultations.</em><…
... application:
I have two worries: 1) low undergrad GPA 2) Did ... />
Two ideas for your personal statement.
1) When I ... Merced I joined a group offering classes in Capoeira as a means ... -
[Webinar—Ended] Live Lightning Consultations—Mon @ 9 pm EST<p>7Sagers,</p> <p>On <strong>Monday</strong>, September 19, at <strong>9 pm EST,</strong> I’ll do another round of <em>live lightning consultatio…
... undergrad I held executive positions in several clubs/organizations and ... advice for LORs. I have two underway—(1) a practicing attorney and ... professor who can do the same. Should a third be a ... personal history with becoming interested in studying law. And how ... -
[Ended] Post LSAT Live Lightning Consultations—Wed, Sept. 28th @ 9 pm EST<p>7Sagers,</p> <p>On <strong>Wednesday</strong>, September 28, at <strong>9 pm EST,</strong> I’ll do a very special post-LSAT round of <em>live l…
... undergrad I held executive positions in several clubs/organizations and ... advice for LORs. I have two underway—(1) a practicing attorney and ... professor who can do the same. Should a third be a ... personal history with becoming interested in studying law. And how ... -
When to use in/out game board and when to use double layer grouping game board? (LG)Just as the title says... Is there anything suggests which to use in reading the stimulus? Thanks
... or non-explicitly be given two sets of variables. Explicitly ... would be something like two shifts per day, a.m ... in their first question here's group 1, can X,Y, Z be in group 1 ... to distinguish between groups and two sets of variables. Literally most ... -
Translating "Never" into lawgicCouple of questions: 1. How does one translate "never" into Lawgic? I know this is a group 4 indicator, but could someone really break it down and …
... see from our two examples the "never" gets put in the necessary ... /> again the "never" got put in the necessary condition because we ... /> Again the "never" went in the necessary condition because if ... is what in short we have named what the group 4 indicators do ... -
Audio LSAT HelpHi fellow scholars! I have a long commute to work (about 40 mins) and in between studying on my own, I was curious if anyone had any audio books …
... this with the lawgic indicators. The podcaster would say ... out loud) which group "only" is in and how it ... logical fallacies, etc.) in the curriculum could be used ... focused on one or two topics would be ideal, ... Having the lesson reviews in podcast form would be ... -
Logic Games : [Never Together/Always Together] v. [Not Both] Rule ConfusionHello, During In-Out Games, I am consistently getting confused between the Not Both Rule and the Biconditional (Always Together/Never Together) R…
... serve on the panel in the same year as each other ... once, between exactly two groups is essentially an in/out game. Then ... paid "exactly" once between "exactly two days", whereas the second example ... days, and 1 & 5 cannot paid together in the same day, then ... -
PT57.S3.Q15 - medical ethicist: assuming there isI do not understand why, "'it is never acceptable to offer experimental treatments to patients who experience no extreme symptoms of the the relevant…
...
So you are right in the effect of the negate ... the sufficient and producing the same effect that would occur if ... would be OET some /ES. In English, we can offer experimental ... and review group four indicators. I still go back over indicators and grammar ... -
Group 3 Logical Indicators problemsJust started Group 3 Logical Indicators, and I'm confused. I'm not confused about the process (or at least I don't think I am). With Group 3 Indicato…
... it doesn't make sense in my head unless I negate ... , like we were doing for Group 1/2 indicators. Take for instance.
Following the Group 3 Indicator Rules ... -
Second time through LRHi 7sagers... I've noticed that in my recent PT's I have finished the LR sections with approximately 5 - 7 minutes left at which time I will go back …
... s say I get two with high confidence and ... .
Net gain: 1.25 in 2:15.
Net gain: 1.25 in 3:30.
< ... first. I get the same return for less time. ... answers.
In reality, my LR performance ... a 0.9 the same way you mark a ... -
Only....ifIs it ok to translate "Writing can *only* succeed *if* it meets the expectations." as: "Meet Expectation --> Succeed" or Is it "Succeed --> …
... we interprete these statements the same, I think, owes to ... think I may just apply Group 1 & 2 translations without ... /> > (6) We can vacation in Colorado only if Alan joins ... is a precondition for vacationing in Colorado. Colorado -> Alan< ... -
Only....ifIs it ok to translate "Writing can *only* succeed *if* it meets the expectations." as: "Meet Expectation --> Succeed" or Is it "Succeed --> …
... we interprete these statements the same, I think, owes to ... think I may just apply Group 1 & 2 translations without ... we could reasonably interprete it in opposing ways.
... is a precondition for vacationing in Colorado. Colorado -> Alan ... -
Only....ifIs it ok to translate "Writing can *only* succeed *if* it meets the expectations." as: "Meet Expectation --> Succeed" or Is it "Succeed --> …
... we interprete these statements the same, I think, owes to ... think I may just apply Group 1 & 2 translations without ... we could reasonably interprete it in opposing ways.
> < ... is a precondition for vacationing in Colorado. Colorado -> Alan ... -
deletedSorry if you were responding.
... indeed causing even a 1% decrease in deforestation, wouldn't you ... call something effective. Even a 1% seems good enough.
two statements to say government efforts ... decreasing). In both cases something started and at the same time ... -
How to use the LR drill packetsHey guys, Looking for pointers on how you guys use the LR drill packets. What have you found helpful? Since we only have a finite number of 'fr…
... etc.) and solidify my trust in my intuitions.
> < ... LR packets covering PT 1-35. In the first group (1-9) there is ... they're arranged by difficulty in the drill packets)?
> ... and purposes, are basically the same. Anyway, I was having trouble ... -
Thoughts on how to tackle PTs...Hi everyone, I'm not sure if anyone has encountered the situation I am in but I'm sure you all will have some helpful input regardless! My cold d…
... mostly draw from tests 1-35 in order to leave the ... , I doubt taking tests 1-30 will be all that ... would study essentially the same way you would have if ... retake a PT or two every weekend and review ... journal in your free time which could attain the same effect ... -
LR questionHow to describe the situation: No one in this house will go to the party. A. In this house ------》-- go to the party B. -- in this house -------…
... lesson/basic-translation-group-4/
Step 1) Identify the logical ... />
Step 2) Identify the two main concepts (or groups, categories ... , it’s the two events “one is in the house” and “ ... the two main concepts
Here, “H” for “one is in the ... -
Month left and me and Flaw questions still don't get along...So about a month out from the September test and I'm feeling....okay. There is one kind of questions that really bothers me though. Flaw. People alwa…
... can be hard in two ways:
1. It could be ... get down quickly to two at most three answer ... you are down to two answer choices that are ... answer choice after filling in for the referential phrasing ... in LSAT writers shoes but keeping the logic the same ... -
URM AdmissionsSo, as a URM myself it's pretty awesome to hear that your chances of admission to harder schools with lower than the median scores at those schools i…
... schools but once they are in, they aren't going ... the same test to a group of African-Americans and a group ... prepatory drill". The two groups scored generally the same overall. When the ...
" _The “achievement gap” in US education has complex causes ... -
URM AdmissionsSo, as a URM myself it's pretty awesome to hear that your chances of admission to harder schools with lower than the median scores at those schools i…
... schools but once they are in, they aren't going ... the same test to a group of African-Americans and a group of ... prepatory drill". The two groups scored generally the same overall. When the ...
> " _The “achievement gap” in US education has complex causes ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... /> >
> Section 1: RC. I totally bombed it ... really struggled for the first two sections and, overall, it ... ll see in October!
I had the same exact experience ... it super distracting). Two girls started sobbing in the middle of Section ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... sure it's the same for everyone. It's ... School drinking policy was in my first section which ... maybe we had the same test...do you recall a ... because I guessed on 1 question in the first LR because ... difficult. Was debating between two answer choices on one ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... sticks because I guessed on 1 question in the first LR because ... difficult. Was debating between two answer choices on one question ... gut instinct/panic.
Same...between that LR section and ... everyone predicts, between those two alone I feel like I ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... > > > > @"Mitchell-1" said:
> > > ... because I guessed on 1 question in the first LR because ...
Anecdotally, I thought the same in June because of the inferences ... at 170 (somehow only missed two in inferences). You never KNOW ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... /> > > > @"Mitchell-1" said:
> > > ... because I guessed on 1 question in the first LR because ... /> > Anecdotally, I thought the same in June because of the inferences ... at 170 (somehow only missed two in inferences). You never KNOW ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... > > > > @"Mitchell-1" said:
> > > ... because I guessed on 1 question in the first LR because ... > Anecdotally, I thought the same in June because of the inferences ... at 170 (somehow only missed two in inferences). You never KNOW ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... /> > > > @"Mitchell-1" said:
> > > ... because I guessed on 1 question in the first LR because ... > Anecdotally, I thought the same in June because of the inferences ... at 170 (somehow only missed two in inferences). You never KNOW until ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... > > > > @"Mitchell-1" said:
> > > ... because I guessed on 1 question in the first LR because ... > Anecdotally, I thought the same in June because of the inferences ... at 170 (somehow only missed two in inferences). You never KNOW ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... /> > > > @"Mitchell-1" said:
> > > ... because I guessed on 1 question in the first LR because ... > Anecdotally, I thought the same in June because of the inferences ... at 170 (somehow only missed two in inferences). You never KNOW until ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... > > > > @"Mitchell-1" said:
> > > ... because I guessed on 1 question in the first LR because ... > Anecdotally, I thought the same in June because of the inferences ... at 170 (somehow only missed two in inferences). You never KNOW ...
