The first sentence is just context and does not have a place in our conditional chain. You are correct that the quantifier ELCI should "some" over to LCI. So replace ELCI --> LCI with ELCI -some-> LCI. Still ac(A) is correct. Nice spot!
@alexandergreene93 said:
It's not a good idea to look at people like Lloyd Blankfein or David Rubinstein and conclude that getting a JD will put you in a similar position.
Causation can appear in pretty much ... you can't use the causation strategies if the question doesn ... problem? Trying to apply the causation strategy when it's not ...
... 'll nail everything related to causation on the LSAT. It should ... the Scientific Method, which covers causation in reasonable depth. It should ...
Arguments involving causation are a subset of arguments ... 's what you do with causation arguments too. Your question is ... the way of your thinking. Causation is exactly what it sounds ... ? If so, you whip out causation logic. No? Leave it at ...
... arguments say there's a causation relationship when that's not ... that there isn't a causation relationship and you have to ... so used to taking apart causation arguments - however, out author is ...
... rules kick, there is theoretically universal distribution. Much like with the ... all three symptoms? Sure. Theoretically universal distribution. Chart.