A valid conclusions is a conclusions that's already 100% proven by it's premises. Can these questions ever be strengthened or weakened? Or do strengthening and weakening questions always have a stimulus with some error
I don't get the correct answer choice for this question. Initially, I thought the argument part is the background problem that the stimulus is resolving. Let me know your thoughts on how to get to the right answer.
... have seen ("_WOTF principles, if valid, most helps to justify the ... conclusion of the _____'s argument is most strongly supported if ... WOTF completes the argument?"_)
... impose on the argument, not ones that the argument **actually makes**. ... Sometimes the assumption the argument makes happens to also be ...
Are there times an argument actually makes an assumption that ... within a stimulus or argument that’s unrelated or ...
I'm having so much difficulty with these types of problems (which argument is most similar to the structure of the paragraph), does anyone have any advice for these?
... no correlation, then a valid reason to there being higher ... attraction opening- would weaken argument bc would explain the ... have risen- would weaken argument bc directly correlates with increased ... remained unchanged- would support argument bc people most likely ...
I just did the skill builder for drawing valid conclusions 1 and I can't wrap my head around it at all is there any other better more in depth explanation for it?
... curriculum, the way JY teaches Argument Part questions, he tells us ... an "assumption" role in the argument if it is explicitly stated ... to ever have a correct Argument Part answer choice reference an ...
... The principle behind this argument is "if a justification ... then the justification is valid. But obviously this is ... all a valid way of supporting the argument. I mean ... is saying that the argument does not consider ... it is strengthening the argument. Now we have ...
... increase use of other forms of tobacco. Here, ... increased use of other forms of tobacco. AC ... other forms of tobacco seems like a valid alternate ... Cause: people switched to other forms of tobacco; effect: drop ... switched over to other forms of tobacco instead" is ...
... really really dang close to valid (and in real world terms ... what is wrong with the argument and find an AC true ... for the argument)
2) Finding the main ...
... is by no means a valid assumption. It is certainly possible ... Who cares about households? Our argument certainly doesn't.
B ... cares about used cars? Our argument certainly doesn't (is ... here?)
C. Strengthens the argument. Shows that the bottom of ...
... you chose will strengthen the argument just by a little and ... />
-PSA will make a decent argument almost perfect. "Just a little ... />
-SA will make a decent argument PERFECT! No assumptions whatsoever. argument valid.