Hey guys, does anyone have any suggestions on recognizing when an argument is causal when it does not include key words like "responsible for", "resulted in", or straight up "caused"?
I'm seeing question 22 on on Section 2 in PT 73 being ...
... a conceptual framework for analyzing arguments. I believe this helped ... on 7sage, we look at arguments from the 'vertical' model ... started to also look at arguments as such:**
... />
As we know, arguments are PREMISES ––> CONCLUSION.
... of the following principles, if valid, most helps to justify the ... to assume each one is valid or true. It is our ... comes close to creating a valid argument is great, but, it ...
I am having a hard time accessing the PDF files for the questions. The system tells me to enter a password & when I do it says the password is invalid. I have changed my password 3 times and I’m having no luck accessing them. #pleasehelp
What is the primary difference between Necessary Assumption Qs and Sufficient Assumption Qs? Both are required to make the argument valid but I'm not quire sure how the answer choices differ.