... least one of N or U are out"
So ... you list are correct: U is out, N is ... out, U and N are both out ... to G-->N or U, then at least one ... of N or U would have to be ... So, N in, or U in, or both N and ... U in.
You've ...
Thank you for responding guys! :) That color analogy was truly creative and awesome! I think this is one of those questions that test your understanding of proportion. Here's how I summarized this question:
I have an international GPA (round up to 3.6), and the LSAC transcript evaluation was only "above average". I have a STEM PhD from a top US engineering school and work experience in a law firm. I also think acing the LSAT is important. I got into Berkeley ...
... , even remotely close to the U.S system, seems unlikely. The ... schools. Getting a JD from U of T (school with the ... a job in Alberta against U of C grads. Your employment ...
@nye8870 @runiggyrun @Pacifico Thanks for all the responses. You made me think harder about this question because I still wasn't comfy with Answer D -- and I think I figured out why: Answer D is (correctly) a NA and not (as I originally viewed) a SA:
Why? Because? is a good way to do it the Why being the C, Because P... for some reason on arguments with a subC I also like to use the 'Therefore" test. its just the reverse of the Why/Because as its Premise Therefore Conclusion...