Up until about 2 billion years ago, the sun was 30 percent dimmer than it is now. If the sun were that dim now, our oceans would be completely frozen. According to fossil evidence, however, life and liquid water were both present as early as 3.8 billion years ago.

"Surprising" Phenomenon
Why was liquid water present back when the sun was so dim?

Objective
A hypothesis resolving this discrepancy must explain how Earth had liquid water 3.8 billion years ago. It must either identify a source of water other than the oceans or state a difference between Earth today and Earth 3.8 billion years ago that allowed the oceans to contain liquid water before the sun brightened.

A
Our atmosphere currently holds in significantly less heat than it did 3.8 billion years ago.
This explains the presence of liquid water 3.8 billion years ago. The atmosphere held more heat back then, so the oceans were not frozen despite the dimmer sun.
B
The liquid water present 3.8 billion years ago later froze, only to melt again about 2 billion years ago.
This does not explain how liquid water was present in the first place. The sun only brightened about 2 billion years ago, so the presence of water 3.8 billion years ago remains a mystery.
C
A significant source of heat other than the sun contributed to the melting of ice sheets approximately 2 billion years ago.
This widens the discrepancy by suggesting the oceans were frozen until about 2 billion years ago. It does not explain the presence of liquid water 3.8 billion years ago.
D
Evidence suggests that certain regions of ocean remained frozen until much more recently than 2 billion years ago.
This does not address the presence of liquid water 3.8 billion years ago. It implies that parts of Earth were colder than expected 2 billion years ago, but makes no mention of Earth 3.8 billion years ago.
E
When large portions of the globe are ice-covered, more of the sun’s heat is reflected and not absorbed by the earth than when only the poles are ice-covered.
This implies frozen oceans are likely to remain frozen and liquid oceans are likely to remain liquid, without addressing Earth 3.8 billion years ago. If the oceans were liquid back then, it remains unexplained why they were liquid.

28 comments

Each of many different human hormones can by itself raise the concentration of glucose in the blood. The reason for this is probably a metabolic quirk of the brain. To see this, consider that although most human cells can produce energy from fats and proteins, brain cells can use only glucose. Thus, if blood glucose levels fall too low, brain cells will rapidly starve, leading to unconsciousness and death.

Summarize Argument: Phenomenon-Hypothesis
The argument concludes that a metabolic quirk of the brain is likely to be the reason that many different human hormones can raise the concentration of glucose in the blood. To prove this, the argument cites the fact that the brain can only use glucose for energy, while most other cells can produce energy from fats and proteins. Because glucose is the brain’s exclusive energy source, low levels of glucose in the blood can be very dangerous for brain cells, potentially leading to unconsciousness and death.

Identify Conclusion
The conclusion tells us the reason why different human hormones can raise blood glucose on their own: “The reason for this is probably a metabolic quirk of the brain.”

A
Each of many different human hormones can by itself raise blood glucose levels.
This is the phenomenon that our conclusion sets out to explain. The argument does not provide support for this claim; we accept it upfront, which tells us that this is not the conclusion. The hypothesis that this phenomenon is caused by a metabolic quirk is the main conclusion.
B
The reason that many different hormones can each independently raise blood glucose levels is probably a metabolic quirk of the brain.
This is the claim that the rest of the argument works to prove, which makes it the main conclusion. This statement tells us the cause of the phenomenon introduced in the argument; the rest of the argument provides support for this causal reasoning.
C
Although most human cells can produce energy from fats and proteins, brain cells can produce energy only from glucose.
This claim supports the sub-conclusion that a low level of blood glucose is dangerous for the brain. This answer is a premise, not the main conclusion.
D
If blood glucose levels fall too low, then brain cells starve, resulting in loss of consciousness and death.
This is a sub-conclusion that helps support the main conclusion, which is that a metabolic quirk is the reason many different hormones can raise blood glucose levels. This answer tells us why it is so important for the body to be able to maintain healthy blood glucose levels.
E
The reason brain cells starve if deprived of glucose is that they can produce energy only from glucose.
This statement references the sub-conclusion, but adds causal reasoning into the sub-conclusion. This is not the main conclusion that the entire argument works to support.

46 comments

Human resources director: While only some recent university graduates consider work environment an important factor in choosing a job, they all consider salary an important factor. Further, whereas the only workers who consider stress level an important factor in choosing a job are a few veteran employees, every recent university graduate considers vacation policy an important factor.

Summary

Every recent university graduate considers salary an important factor in choosing a job. Some recent university graduates consider work environment an important factor. All recent graduates consider vacation policy an important factor. The only workers who consider stress level an important factor are a few veteran employees.

Notable Valid Inferences

Some people who consider work environment an important factor also consider vacation policy as an important factor.

Some people who consider work environment an important factor also consider salary as an important factor.

Some people who consider salary an important factor also consider vacation policy an important factor.

A
All people who consider work environment an important factor in choosing a job also consider salary an important factor.

Could be false. We can never infer an “all” statement between conditions with a sufficient condition in common. We can only infer “some” statements.

B
At least some people who consider work environment an important factor in choosing a job consider vacation policy an important factor as well.

Must be true. As shown below, we can combine claims that some recent graduates consider work environment important and that all recent graduates consider vacation policy important. We can always infer a “some” statement between conditions with a sufficient condition in common.

C
At least some veteran employees do not consider work environment an important factor in choosing a job.

Could be false. We only know that some veteran employees are the only workers that consider stress level important. We cannot infer anything else about these veteran employees. As shown on our diagram, there are no other conditional statements attached to this condition.

D
All people who consider vacation policy an important factor in choosing a job also consider salary an important factor.

Could be false. We can never infer an “all” statement between conditions with a sufficient condition in common. We can only infer “some” statements.

E
No one for whom salary is an important factor in choosing a job also considers stress level an important factor.

Could be false. We can never infer an “all” statement between conditions with a sufficient condition in common. We can only infer “some” statements.


36 comments

No small countries and no countries in the southern hemisphere have permanent seats on the United Nations Security Council. Each of the five countries with a permanent seat on the Security Council is in favor of increased international peacekeeping efforts and a greater role for the United Nations in moderating regional disputes. However, some countries that are in favor of increased international peacekeeping efforts are firmly against increased spending on refugees by the United Nations.

Summary
If a country has a permanent seat on the United Nations Security Council, then that country is not a small country and not a country in the southern hemisphere. Each country with a permanent seat is in favor of increased international peacekeeping efforts and a greater role for the United Nations in moderating regional disputes. However, some countries in favor of increased international peacekeeping efforts are firmly against increased spending on refugees.

Notable Valid Inferences
Some countries in favor of a greater role for the United Nations in regional disputes are not countries in the southern hemisphere.
Some countries in favor of increased international peacekeeping efforts are not small countries.
Some countries in favor of a greater role for the United Nations in regional disputes are not small countries.

A
Some small countries do not want the United Nations to increase its spending on refugees.
Could be false. We only have information in the stimulus about countries that are not small countries. This answer choice is outside of the scope of our conditions.
B
Some countries in the southern hemisphere are not in favor of increased international peacekeeping efforts.
Could be false. We only have information in the stimulus about countries that are not in the southern hemisphere. This answer choice is outside of the scope of our conditions.
C
Some countries that have permanent seats on the United Nations Security Council are against increased spending on refugees by the United Nations.
Could be false. This answer is a popular invalid inference form. It is possible that no countries with permanent seats are against increased spending on refugees.
D
Some small countries are in favor of a greater role for the United Nations in moderating regional disputes.
Could be false. We only have information in the stimulus about countries that are not small countries. This answer choice is outside of the scope of our conditions.
E
Some countries that are in favor of a greater role for the United Nations in moderating regional disputes are not located in the southern hemisphere.
Must be true. You can always make “some” inferences between “all” statements that branch off from a common sufficient condition. There must always be some overlap between “all” statements.

29 comments