Video games are commonly criticized as morally corrupting in that they allow people to imagine themselves transgressing conventional morality. But it is telling that precisely this criticism was leveled against many forms of popular culture in their early stages of development, including novels, movies, and rock music. And just as it now seems silly to suggest that reading novels is morally corrupting, _______.

Summary
Some people claim that video games are morally corrupting because they allow people to imagine themselves transgressing conventional morality. However, this same criticism was applied in the past to many other forms of popular culture during their early stages of development.

Strongly Supported Conclusions
And just as it now seems silly to suggest that reading novels is morally corrupting, eventually the criticism surrounding video games will also fade.

A
we should expect most new forms of popular culture to be criticized as morally corrupting
We do not know if most new forms of popular culture will be criticized in their early stages. We only know that some new forms of popular culture in the past were criticized.
B
we should prefer forms of popular culture that have matured to those that are still in their early stages of development
We do not know what forms of popular culture one should prefer.
C
we can expect these concerns about video games to fade over time
If criticisms surrounding novels faded over time, then criticisms surrounding video games will also fade over time.
D
we should condemn forms of popular culture that allow people to imagine themselves transgressing conventional morality
The argument does not make a determination about what forms of popular culture we should condemn. We only know that some new forms are condemned or were condemned in the past.
E
it is silly to suggest that video games do not allow people to imagine themselves transgressing conventional morality
The argument concedes that video games allow people to imagine themselves transgressing conventional morality.

1 comment

Note: This is video #2 in a two-part explanation using the split approach for comparative passages. In the previous video, J.Y. already tackled whatever questions he could based solely on a readthrough of Passage A. In this video, he picks up with Passage B and then cleans up the remaining questions. So, if you don't see a full explanation for a given question in this video, it's because J.Y. tackled that question in the previous video. (Press shift + ← to head to the previous video.)

30 comments

Note: This video deals with Passage A only. In this video, J.Y. uses the split approach for comparrative passages. This means he reads through Passage A and then makes a first pass through the questions, answering them to the extent possible based solely on the information in Passage A. For an explanation of Passage B and the remaining unsolved questions, head to the next video (shift + → on your keyboard).

8 comments

Philosopher: A person is morally responsible for an action only if that action is performed freely. And an action is free only if there is an alternative action that is genuinely open to the person. But an alternative action is genuinely open only if performing that alternative action is not morally wrong.

Summary

The stimulus can be diagrammed as follows:

Notable Valid Inferences

If someone is morally responsible for an action, then it is not the case that the alternative to that action is morally wrong.

If an action was performed freely, then it is not the case that the alternative to that action is morally wrong.

If someone is morally responsible for an action, then there is an alternative action that is genuinely open to the person.

A
An alternative action is not genuinely open to a person unless that person would be morally responsible for performing the alternative action.

Could be false. We know that moral responsibility is a sufficient condition for an alternative action being genuinely open; (A) mixes up the sufficient and necessary conditions of this relationship.

B
People are not morally responsible for most of the actions that they perform.

Could be false. The stimulus does not discuss any quantities; we cannot make any inferences about “most” actions that people perform.

C
A person is morally responsible for an action if there is an alternative action that is genuinely open to the person.

Could be false. We know that moral responsibility is a sufficient condition for an alternative action being genuinely open. Like (A), (C) mixes up the sufficient and necessary conditions of this relationship.

D
If it would be morally wrong for a person to perform a given action, then that action is genuinely open to that person.

Could be false. We know that if an alternative action is morally wrong, then that alternative action was not genuinely open. (D) misses the fact that this relationship discusses “alternative” actions. Also, the necessary condition is that the action is not genuinely open.

E
An action is not free unless there is an alternative action that is not morally wrong.

Must be true. As shown below, an action being performed freely is a sufficient condition for the alternative to that action not being morally wrong.


15 comments