LSAT 104 – Section 4 – Question 17
LSAT 104 - Section 4 - Question 17
December 1998You need a full course to see this video. Enroll now and get started in less than a minute.
Target time: 1:01
This is question data from the 7Sage LSAT Scorer. You can score your LSATs, track your results, and analyze your performance with pretty charts and vital statistics - all with a Free Account ← sign up in less than 10 seconds
Question QuickView |
Type | Tags | Answer Choices |
Curve | Question Difficulty |
Psg/Game/S Difficulty |
Explanation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PT104 S4 Q17 |
+LR
| Inference +Inf Conditional Reasoning +CondR | A
89%
169
B
3%
159
C
4%
164
D
1%
157
E
3%
158
|
138 147 157 |
+Medium | 147.438 +SubsectionMedium |
Summary
If any of the Green Ensemble’s corporate sponsors had withdrawn their financial support, the group would have been forced to disband this year. But the Green Ensemble did not disband this year.
Very Strongly Supported Conclusions
None of the corporate sponsors of the Green Ensemble withdrew their financial support. (We know that if any had withdrawn, the Ensemble would have shut down. But it didn’t shut down. So there’s no way any corporate sponsor could have withdrawn financial support.)
A
None of the Green Ensemble’s corporate sponsors withdrew their financial support of the group this year.
Must be true, because we know the Ensemble has not shut down. This triggers the contrapositive of the first sentence, which tells us that none of the corporate sponsors could have withdrawn their financial support.
B
Earlier this year the Green Ensemble found other sources of funding for next year, making the group less dependent on corporations for financial support.
We don’t know that the Ensemble got funding from other sources. It may have gotten all of its funding from corporate sponsors.
C
During this year corporate funding for the Green Ensemble has been steadily increasing.
We don’t know whether corporate funding has increased or decreased. All we know is that no corporate sponsor withdrew financial support.
D
This year corporate funding was the source of more than half of the Green Ensemble’s income.
We don’t know what proportion of the Ensemble’s funding comes from corporate sponsors.
E
Corporate funding for nonprofit theater groups like the Green Ensemble has recently increased.
We don’t know whether corporate funding has increased. All we know is that no corporate sponsor withdrew financial support.
Take PrepTest
Review Results
LSAT PrepTest 104 Explanations
Section 1 - Logical Reasoning
- Question 01
- Question 02
- Question 03
- Question 04
- Question 05
- Question 06
- Question 07
- Question 08
- Question 09
- Question 10
- Question 11
- Question 12
- Question 13
- Question 14
- Question 15
- Question 16
- Question 17
- Question 18
- Question 19
- Question 20
- Question 21
- Question 22
- Question 23
- Question 24
- Question 25
- Question 26
Section 2 - Reading Comprehension
- Passage 1 – Passage
- Passage 1 – Questions
- Passage 2 – Passage
- Passage 2 – Questions
- Passage 3 – Passage
- Passage 3 – Questions
- Passage 4 – Passage
- Passage 4 – Questions
Section 3 - Reading Comprehension
- Passage 1 – Passage
- Passage 1 – Questions
- Passage 2 – Passage
- Passage 2 – Questions
- Passage 3 – Passage
- Passage 3 – Questions
- Passage 4 – Passage
- Passage 4 – Questions
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment. You can get a free account here.