LSAT 132 – Section 2 – Question 18
LSAT 132 - Section 2 - Question 18
December 2010You need a full course to see this video. Enroll now and get started in less than a minute.
Target time: 1:38
This is question data from the 7Sage LSAT Scorer. You can score your LSATs, track your results, and analyze your performance with pretty charts and vital statistics - all with a Free Account ← sign up in less than 10 seconds
Question QuickView |
Type | Tags | Answer Choices |
Curve | Question Difficulty |
Psg/Game/S Difficulty |
Explanation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PT132 S2 Q18 |
+LR
| Must be false +MBF Conditional Reasoning +CondR Rule-Application +RuleApp | A
4%
156
B
5%
156
C
4%
156
D
79%
165
E
7%
157
|
142 151 160 |
+Medium | 148.345 +SubsectionMedium |
Vanessa: All computer code must be written by a pair of programmers working at a single workstation. This is needed to prevent programmers from writing idiosyncratic code that can be understood only by the original programmer.
Jo: Most programming projects are kept afloat by the best programmers on the team, who are typically at least 100 times more productive than the worst. Since they generally work best when they work alone, the most productive programmers must be allowed to work by themselves.
Summary
Vanessa believes that all computer code must be written by two programmers who collaborate at the same work station.
Vanessa’s belief is based on her assertion that collaboration prevents programmers from writing code that only they can understand.
Jo believes that the most productive programmers must be allowed to work by themselves.
Jo’s belief is based on two assertions: that the best programmers keep most programming projects afloat through their prolificness, and that these most productive programmers generally work better solo.
Notable Valid Inferences
The correct answer will describe an assignment that violates either Jo’s principle, Vanessa’s principle, or both principles. To violate Jo’s principle, the right answer would have to describe an assignment in which the most productive programmer on a team is forced to work collaboratively. To violate Vanessa’s principle, the right answer would have to describe an assignment wherein computer code is produced by someone other than a pair of programmers working at the same work station.
A
Olga and Kensuke are both programmers of roughly average productivity who feel that they are more productive when working alone. They have been assigned to work together at a single workstation.
Consistent with both principles. Because Olga and Kensuke are assigned to work together at a single workstation, the assignment satisfies Vanessa’s principle. Because they’re not the most productive programmers, Jo’s principle doesn’t mandate that they be permitted to work solo.
B
John is experienced but is not among the most productive programmers on the team. He has been assigned to mentor Tyrone, a new programmer who is not yet very productive. They are to work together at a single workstation.
Consistent with both principles. Because John and the new programmer are assigned to work together at a single workstation, the assignment satisfies Vanessa’s principle. Because they’re not the most productive programmers, Jo’s principle doesn’t apply.
C
Although not among the most productive programmers on the team, Chris is more productive than Jennifer. They have been assigned to work together at a single workstation.
Consistent with both principles. Because Chris and Jennifer are assigned to work together at a single station, the assignment satisfies Vanessa’s principle. Because they’re not the most productive programmers, Jo’s principle doesn’t mandate that they be permitted to work solo.
D
Yolanda is the most productive programmer on the team. She has been assigned to work with Mike, who is also very productive. They are to work together at the same workstation.
Inconsistent with Jo’s principle. Because Yolanda is the most productive programmer on the team, any assignment that is consistent with Jo’s principle must allow her to work alone.
E
Kevin and Amy both have a reputation for writing idiosyncratic code; neither is unusually productive. They have been assigned to work together at the same workstation.
Consistent with both principles. Because Kevin and Amy are assigned to work together at a single workstation, the assignment satisfies Vanessa’s principle. Because they’re not the most productive programmers, Jo’s principle doesn’t mandate that they be permitted to work solo.
Take PrepTest
Review Results
LSAT PrepTest 132 Explanations
Section 1 - Reading Comprehension
- Passage 1 – Passage
- Passage 1 – Questions
- Passage 2 – Passage
- Passage 2 – Questions
- Passage 3 – Passage
- Passage 3 – Questions
- Passage 4 – Passage
- Passage 4 – Questions
Section 2 - Logical Reasoning
- Question 01
- Question 02
- Question 03
- Question 04
- Question 05
- Question 06
- Question 07
- Question 08
- Question 09
- Question 10
- Question 11
- Question 12
- Question 13
- Question 14
- Question 15
- Question 16
- Question 17
- Question 18
- Question 19
- Question 20
- Question 21
- Question 22
- Question 23
- Question 24
- Question 25
- Question 26
Section 3 - Reading Comprehension
- Passage 1 – Passage
- Passage 1 – Questions
- Passage 2 – Passage
- Passage 2 – Questions
- Passage 3 – Passage
- Passage 3 – Questions
- Passage 4 – Passage
- Passage 4 – Questions
Section 4 - Logical Reasoning
- Question 01
- Question 02
- Question 03
- Question 04
- Question 05
- Question 06
- Question 07
- Question 08
- Question 09
- Question 10
- Question 11
- Question 12
- Question 13
- Question 14
- Question 15
- Question 16
- Question 17
- Question 18
- Question 19
- Question 20
- Question 21
- Question 22
- Question 23
- Question 24
- Question 25
- Question 26
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment. You can get a free account here.