LSAT 133 – Section 3 – Question 02
LSAT 133 - Section 3 - Question 02
June 2011You need a full course to see this video. Enroll now and get started in less than a minute.
Target time: 0:40
This is question data from the 7Sage LSAT Scorer. You can score your LSATs, track your results, and analyze your performance with pretty charts and vital statistics - all with a Free Account ← sign up in less than 10 seconds
Question QuickView |
Type | Tags | Answer Choices |
Curve | Question Difficulty |
Psg/Game/S Difficulty |
Explanation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PT133 S3 Q02 |
+LR
| Flaw or descriptive weakening +Flaw Sampling +Smpl | A
2%
154
B
1%
153
C
1%
151
D
93%
163
E
4%
158
|
127 137 146 |
+Easier | 147.69 +SubsectionMedium |
Summarize Argument
The artist concludes that almost everyone in the country wants to be an artist. This is based on the observation that most people the artist knows want to be artists.
Identify and Describe Flaw
This is a cookie-cutter unrepresentative sampling flaw. The artist draws a conclusion about everyone in the country based on an observation about the people the artist knows. But an artist’s social circle is more likely to include people who want to be artists compared to the general public, so their life goals are probably not representative of the goals of the general population of the country.
A
contains a premise that presupposes the truth of the conclusion
The artist’s conclusion is not based on any premises that presuppose or restate the conclusion.
B
presumes that what is true of each person in a country is also true of the country’s population as a whole
The artist doesn’t presume that something that is true of each person in a country is true of the country’s population as a whole.
C
defends a view solely on the grounds that the view is widely held
The artist doesn’t use the popularity of any view as support for a conclusion.
D
bases its conclusion on a sample that is unlikely to accurately represent people in the country as a whole
The argument uses the small sample of the artist’s friends to support its conclusion about the people in the country as a whole. An artist’s friends are not likely to represent the whole country when it comes to the goal of being an artist.
E
fails to make a needed distinction between wanting to be an artist and making a living as an artist
This distinction isn’t necessary to the argument. It’s clear that what the artist is talking about is wanting a career as an artist in either case.
Take PrepTest
Review Results
LSAT PrepTest 133 Explanations
Section 1 - Logical Reasoning
- Question 01
- Question 02
- Question 03
- Question 04
- Question 05
- Question 06
- Question 07
- Question 08
- Question 09
- Question 10
- Question 11
- Question 12
- Question 13
- Question 14
- Question 15
- Question 16
- Question 17
- Question 18
- Question 19
- Question 20
- Question 21
- Question 22
- Question 23
- Question 24
- Question 25
Section 2 - Logical Reasoning
- Question 01
- Question 02
- Question 03
- Question 04
- Question 05
- Question 06
- Question 07
- Question 08
- Question 09
- Question 10
- Question 11
- Question 12
- Question 13
- Question 14
- Question 15
- Question 16
- Question 17
- Question 18
- Question 19
- Question 20
- Question 21
- Question 22
- Question 23
- Question 24
- Question 25
Section 3 - Logical Reasoning
- Question 01
- Question 02
- Question 03
- Question 04
- Question 05
- Question 06
- Question 07
- Question 08
- Question 09
- Question 10
- Question 11
- Question 12
- Question 13
- Question 14
- Question 15
- Question 16
- Question 17
- Question 18
- Question 19
- Question 20
- Question 21
- Question 22
- Question 23
- Question 24
- Question 25
- Question 26
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment. You can get a free account here.