LSAT 138 – Section 2 – Question 18
LSAT 138 - Section 2 - Question 18
December 2012You need a full course to see this video. Enroll now and get started in less than a minute.
Target time: 1:34
This is question data from the 7Sage LSAT Scorer. You can score your LSATs, track your results, and analyze your performance with pretty charts and vital statistics - all with a Free Account ← sign up in less than 10 seconds
Question QuickView |
Type | Tags | Answer Choices |
Curve | Question Difficulty |
Psg/Game/S Difficulty |
Explanation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PT138 S2 Q18 |
+LR
| Must be true +MBT Conditional Reasoning +CondR Quantifier +Quant | A
2%
152
B
5%
158
C
82%
165
D
2%
154
E
10%
159
|
141 150 159 |
+Medium | 147.395 +SubsectionMedium |
Summary
The stimulus can be diagrammed as follows:

Notable Valid Inferences
Some party members are government officials.
Some party members are speakers at the convention.
Some delegates to the convention are speakers at the convention.
Some party members are speakers at the convention.
Some delegates to the convention are speakers at the convention.
A
Every party member at the convention is a delegate to the convention.
Could be false. While we know that every delegate is a party member, we do not know whether every party member is a delegate. There might be more party members than delegates! (A) confuses the necessary and sufficient conditions.
B
At least some speakers at the convention are neither delegates nor party members.
Could be false. We know that some speakers at the convention are delegates and party members, and those speakers could easily constitute the entire lineup! There could also be other speakers, but there don’t have to be.
C
At least some speakers at the convention are delegates to the convention.
Must be true. As shown below, by chaining the conditional claims, we see that there is a “some before all” relationship between “delegate” and “speaker”. This yields the valid conclusion that at least some delegates are speakers and vice versa.

D
All speakers at the convention are government officials.
Could be false. While we know that every government official at the convention is a speaker, we do not know whether every speaker is a government official. There might be more speakers than government officials! (D) confuses the necessary and sufficient conditions.
E
Every government official at the convention is a party member.
Could be false. We know that some government officials at the convention are party members, because all delegates are party members and some delegates are government officials. Yet it’s possible that there are also government officials at the convention who are not party members.
Take PrepTest
Review Results
LSAT PrepTest 138 Explanations
Section 1 - Reading Comprehension
- Passage 1 – Passage
- Passage 1 – Questions
- Passage 2 – Passage
- Passage 2 – Questions
- Passage 3 – Passage
- Passage 3 – Questions
- Passage 4 – Passage
- Passage 4 – Questions
Section 2 - Logical Reasoning
- Question 01
- Question 02
- Question 03
- Question 04
- Question 05
- Question 06
- Question 07
- Question 08
- Question 09
- Question 10
- Question 11
- Question 12
- Question 13
- Question 14
- Question 15
- Question 16
- Question 17
- Question 18
- Question 19
- Question 20
- Question 21
- Question 22
- Question 23
- Question 24
- Question 25
- Question 26
Section 3 - Logical Reasoning
- Question 01
- Question 02
- Question 03
- Question 04
- Question 05
- Question 06
- Question 07
- Question 08
- Question 09
- Question 10
- Question 11
- Question 12
- Question 13
- Question 14
- Question 15
- Question 16
- Question 17
- Question 18
- Question 19
- Question 20
- Question 21
- Question 22
- Question 23
- Question 24
- Question 25
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment. You can get a free account here.