Self-study
Columnist: A recent study suggests that living with a parrot increases one's risk of lung cancer. ███ ██ ███ ██████ ███ ██████████ ██████ ██████ █████████ ███████████ ██ ███ ██████ ██ ███████ ███████ ██ ████ ████████ ███████ ██ ██ ███ ████ ██████ ███ ██████████ ██████ ███ ████ █████████ ███████ █████ ██ ███████ █████ ████ █████ ████████████ ███████████ ██ ████████████
Summary
The columnist concludes that the government shouldn’t tax certain hunting and recreational items just because they have associated risks.
Notable Valid Inferences
This is a MBT Except question. For this question, all the wrong answers will be consistent with the conclusion that the government shouldn’t tax certain recreational items just because they’re dangerous. The right answer will conflict with this conclusion by offering information that suggests the government should tax certain recreational items just because they’re dangerous.
Analysis by ZaiboonAzhar
19.
Each of the following principles ██ █████████ ██████████ ████ ███ ███████████ ██████████ ███████
a
The government should ████ █████████ ██ ██████ ████████████ ██████ █████████ ███ ████████████ █████
b
The government should ███ ███ █████ ███ █████ █████████ ██████████ ███ █████ ███████ ███████████
c
The government should ██████ █████████ █████████████ ██ █████ █████████████ ██ ██████████ ██ █████ ██████████
d
The government should ███ ██████ █████████ █████████████ ███ ██████ ██ ████ ████ ██ █████ ██████████ ████ ██████ █████ ███ █████████ ███████████
e
The government would ██ █████████ ██ ███████ █████ ██ ███████ ████ ███ ███████ ███ █████ ███ ██████ ██████ ██ ███ ███ █████