Some teachers claim that students would not learn curricular content without the incentive of grades. βββ ββββββββ ββββ βββββββ ββββββββ ββ βββ ββββββββ βββββ βββββ ββ βββββββ ββββ ββββββββββ βββββ βββ ββββββββ ββ ββββββββ βββββββ βββ ββββββββ ββ βββ ββββββββ ββ ββββββββββ ββ ββββ ββ ββββββββββ βββ βββββββββ ββ βββββββ ββββββββββ ββββββ ββ βββββββββ ββββββββ ββββββββ
The author argues that grades do not serve a purpose in schools as an incentive to learn because students who really love the material taught there would learn it without needing to be incentivized, and students who are entirely indifferent to the material would not respond to such an incentive.
The author addresses two groups of students who fall at extremes of a spectrum: the students who are very excited about their schoolβs curriculum and the students who could not care less about it. However, he fails to address students in the middle of the spectrum, who might be somewhat interested in the material but not care enough to learn without an incentive like getting good grades. The authorβs sweeping conclusion about the utility of grades for all students fails to address this group, so his argument is unsupported.
The reasoning in the argument ββ ββββββ βββββββ βββ ββββββββ
takes for granted ββββ βββ ββββ βββββββ ββ ββββββ ββ ββ ββββββ β βββββ ββββ ββ βββββββββββ ββ ββββββββ
takes for granted ββββ ββββββββ βββ βββ βββββββββββ ββ βββ ββββββ ββββ βββββββ βββ βββββββββ ββββββββββ ββ βββ ββββββββββ ββββββββ
fails to consider ββββ βββ βββββββββ ββ ββββββ βββ βββββ ββββ ββββββ βββββββββββ βββββββ
ignores the possibility ββββ ββββββββ βββ ββββ ββββββββ ββ βββ ββββββββββ ββββββββ βββββ ββ βββββ ββββββββββ ββ ββ ββ βββββββ ββ ββββββ βββββ βββ ββββββββββ ββββββββ
fails to consider ββββ ββββ ββββββββ βββ ββ βββββββ ββββββββββ ββ βββ ββββββββββ βββββββββββ ββ βββ βββββββ βββββ ββββββ