Logan: Support Newspapers have always focused on ephemeral matters while ignoring important societal changes. βββ ββββ βββ βββββ ββββββββ βββ ββββββββββ βββ βββββββ ββ ββββ βββββββ βββ ββββββββββββ βββββββββββ
βββββββ βββ ββββ ββββββββ βββββ ββββ βββββββ ββββ βββββββ β ββββββ ββ βββββββββββ βββββ ββββ βββ ββββββ ββ ββ βββ βββββββ βββ βββββ
Logan claims that old newspapers are useless to historians. Why are they useless? Because newspapers have only ever focused on minor matters, without paying any attention to larger changes in society. (Logan is also assuming that the only knowledge thatβs useful to historians is about those larger changes in society.)
Mendezβs argument is designed to support the idea that newspapers are useful to historians, although this is implied rather than stated. To lead to this conclusion, Mendez says that news stories and popular art are a good source of knowledge about peopleβs thoughts and feelings. (Mendez is assuming that this knowledge is useful to historians.)
Weβre looking for a disagreement. Logan and Mendez disagree about whether historical newspapers are useful to historians.
On the basis of their βββββββββββ βββββ βββ ββββββ βββ βββββββββ ββ βββββββββββ ββββ βββββββ
newspapers accurately report βββ ββββ βββββββββ βββββββ ββββββ βββββ ββ β βββββββ
the study of ββββββββ ββββ ββββββ βββββββ ββββββββββββββ ββ βββ βββββββββββ ββ βββββββββ βββββββββ
popular art is ββ βββββββββ ββββββ ββ βββββββββββ βββββ ββββ βββ ββββββ ββ ββββββββ ββββ βββββββ βββ ββββ
newspapers ought to βββββ ββββ ββ βββ βββββ ββ βββββββ ββββ ββββ βββββββ ββββ ββ βββ ββββ
newspaper reports from ββββββ ββββ βββ ββββββ βββββββ ββ ββββββββ βββ βββββββββββββ βββ ββββ