Kris: Years ago, the chemical industry claimed that technological progress cannot occur without pollution. ββββββ ββ βββ ββββ ββ βββββββββββββ βββββββββ βββ ββββββββ βββββ ββββββββ ββββββββββββ βββ ββββββββ β βββββββ ββββ ββββββ βββββββββββββ βββββββββ ββ βββ ββββ ββ βββββββ ββββββ βββ ββββ βββββββββββββ ββ ββββββ βββββββ ββββββββ βββ ββββββββ ββββββββ ββββ ββ ββββββββββ ββββ ββ βββ ββββββββ ββββββββ ββ βββ ββββββββββ
ββββββ ββββββ βββββββ ββββββββ βββββββββ βββ βββββ ββββββββ βββββ βββ βββ βββββ ββββ ββββ ββββββββ ββββββ βββ βββββ ββ ββββββββββ
Terry concludes that Kris is βabsurdβ to claim that the cellular industry must be regulated the same way as the chemical industry because they both produce a form of pollution. Terry supports this position by claiming that chemical pollution is more harmful than the noise pollution produced by cell phones.
Terry counters Krisβs argument by rejecting Krisβs analogy. Kris claims that two industries should be similarly regulated by analogizing their harmful consequences, and Terry counters by claiming that the harms presented by Kris as analogous are very different in severity.
Analysis by AlexandraNash
Terry responds to Kris's argument ββ βββββ βββββ βββ ββ βββ ββββββββββ
questioning the reliability ββ βββ ββββββ ββ βββββββ βββββββββββ ββ ββββββ ββββββββ
attacking the accuracy ββ βββ ββββββββ βββββ βββ ββββββββ ββββββββ ββββ ββββ ββββ βββββββ
arguing that an βββββββ βββββ ββ β βββββββ ββ ββββββββ ββ ββββββ ββ ββββ βββββββ
questioning the strength ββ βββ βββββββ ββ βββββ ββββββ ββββββββ ββ βββββ
rejecting Kris's interpretation ββ βββ ββββ ββββββββββββββ βββββββββ