Support Over 90 percent of the human brain currently serves no purpose, as is evident from the fact that Support many people with significant brain damage show no discernible adverse effects. ββ ββββ ββββββ βββββ ββ βββ ββββ ββββ ββββββββββ ββββββ ββ ββββββββββ βββ βββββββββββ ββββ ββββββββ ββββ βββββ ββββ ββββββββββββββ ββββ ββ ββββββ βββ βββββββ ββ ββββββ
The author concludes that, when humans begin to tap into the tremendous source of creativity and innovation, that many problems that seem insurmountable today will be within our ability to solve. To support this, the author notes that over 90% of the brain remains unused (a sub-conclusion that is supported by the observation that many people with significant brain damage experience no noticeable negative effects).
The author assumes that the large portion of the brain that currently serves no purpose could be a source of creativity and innovation. From the information given, we have no reason to believe that these parts of the brain are a potential source of creativity and innovationββthey could, for example, be purely structural with no potential to impact oneβs creativity.
Which one of the following ββββ ββββββββββ βββββββββ β ββββ ββ βββ βββββββββ
The argument presumes, βββββββ βββββββββ ββββββββββββββ ββββ βββ βββββββ ββ βββββ ββββββ βββ ββββββ ββββββ βββββββββββ
The argument presumes, βββββββ βββββββββ ββββββββββββββ ββββ βββ ββββ ββββββ ββββ βββ βββββββ βββββββ ββββββββ ββ β ββββ ββ ββββββββββ βββ βββββββββββ
The argument infers ββββ βββββββ βββββ ββ βββ βββββ ββ βββββββ ββββββ ββ βββ βββββ ββ βββ βββββββββ ββββ ββ ββ βββ ββββ ββββ ββββ βββ
The argument infers ββββ ββββββββ ββββ ββ ββββββ ββββββ ββ βββ βββββ ββ βββ βββββ ββββ ββββ ββββ ββ ββββββ βββ βββββββ ββ ββββββ
The argument presumes, βββββββ βββββββββ ββββββββββββββ ββββ βββ βββββββββ ββββββ βββββ ββ βββ βββββ βββ β βββββββββ ββββββ ββ ββββββββββ ββββββββββ βββ βββββββββββ