A group of mountain climbers was studied to determine how they were affected by diminished oxygen in the air at high altitudes. ββ ββββ βββββββ ββββ βββββ ββββββ βββββ βββ ββββββ βββ ββββββββ βββββββ ββββββ ββββ ββββββ ββ ββββββββββ ββββββ ββββββββββ βββ ββββββββββββ ββββ βββββββββ ββββ βββββββββββ ββ ββββββββ ββββββββββββ βββββββββ βββ ββββββ ββββ βββ ββββ ββ βββ βββββ βββββββββββ ββββββ ββ ββββββββ ββββ ββββ βββββββββββ βββββ ββββββββββ
The author concludes that the area of the brain controlling speech is not distinct from the area controlling other functions. He supports this by noting that the mountain climbers in the study slurred their speech, took longer to understand simple sentences, and showed poor judgment after climbing above 6,100 meters.
The author concludes that the area of the brain controlling speech isnβt separate from the area controlling other functions because multiple brain functions worsened at high altitudes. He assumes that all these functions are controlled in the same area, ignoring the possibility that multiple areas could have been affected by the altitude.
In other words, the altitude might have impacted multiple distinct brain areas, or the entire brain, affecting both speech and judgment, even though they are controlled in distinct areas.
The argument is most vulnerable ββ βββββββββ ββ βββ βββββββ ββββ ββ βββββββββ βββ βββββββββββ ββββ
the climbers' performance ββ βββββββ ββββββββββββββ βββ βββββββββ βββ ββββββββ βββββββ ββββββ βββββββββββ ββββββββ βββββ ββββββ ββββββ
the climbers' performance ββ βββββββ ββββββββββββββ βββ βββββββββ βββ ββββββ ββββ βββββββ ββββββ ββββ ββββ βββββββ
the climbers showed βββββββββ ββββββ ββ ββββββββββ ββ βββββ βββββββββββ ββ βββββββ ββββββββββββββ βββ βββββββββ
some of the βββββββ βββββββββ ββββ ββββββββ ββββ ββββββ βββ ββββββββ βββββββ βββββ ββββββ
many of the ββββββββ βββ βββββββ ββ βββββββ ββββββββ ββββββ βββ βββββ βββββββ ββββ ββββββ ββ βββββββ βββ ββββββββββ ββββ βββββ βββββ ββββββ βββ ββββββ