Peter: Unlike in the past, most children's stories nowadays don't have clearly immoral characters in them. ββββ βββββββ βββββββ ββββββββ ββββ ββ βββββ βββ ββββββββββββ ββ βββββ ββββ
βββββ ββββββββββ βββββββ βββββ ββββ ββ ββββ βββββββ βββββββ ββββββββββ ββ βββββ βββ βββ βββββ ββββββββββ ββββ βββ ββ ββ βββ ββββ ββββ ββββββββ βββββββββ ββββββ ββββββ ββ ββββββββββββ
Peter argues that childrenβs stories should include clearly immoral characters (which they usually did in the past, but now do not). Why? Because itβs important to teach children the consequences of being bad.
Yoko doesnβt make an argument, but does make several factual claims. First, modern childrenβs stories usually do have clearly immoral characters. Second, these characters are less frightening than in the past. And finally, itβs a good thing to avoid frightening children.
Weβre looking for a disagreement between Peter and Yoko. The two disagree about whether modern childrenβs stories usually contain clearly immoral characters.
Analysis by AlexandraNash
Peter and Yoko disagree over βββββββ βββββββ ββββββββββ βββββββ
should be less βββββββββββ ββββ ββββ βββ
tend to be ββββ βββββββββββ ββββ βββββββ ββββββββββ βββββββ ββββ
differ significantly in βββββββ βββββββ ββββ βββββββ ββββββββββ βββββββ
tend to have βββββββ βββββββ ββββββββββ ββ ββββ
should help children βββββ βββ ββββββββββββ ββ βββββ βββ