Conclusion Humorous television advertisements are the only effective ones. βββ ββ βββββββββ ββ ββββββββ ββ ββββ βββ ββββ βββββββ ββββββββ ββββββββββ ββ ββββ ββββ βββββ βββββββββ ββββ ββββββ βββ β βββββββ ββ ββ βββββββββ ββββ ββββββββββ βββ ββ βββββββββββββ ββ ββ βββββββββ ββ ββββ ββββββ βββ ββββββββ
The author concludes that humorous ads are the only effective ones. He supports this with the following premises:
(1) If something is humorous, it will attract peopleβs attention and allow a message to be conveyed.
(2) If an ad is effective, it must convey its message.
This is the cookie-cutter flaw of confusing necessary and sufficient conditions. We know effective ads convey a message (and so they also can convey a message) but the author then assumes that they must be humorous. In other words, he treats βhumorousβ as necessary for βcan conveyβ when itβs really only sufficient.
He argues that if an ad is effective, it must be humorous, since humorous ads can convey a message. But what if other ads, like emotional ads, can also convey a message? In that case, humorous ads might not be the only effective ones.
Which one of the following ββββ ββββββββββ βββββββββ β ββββ ββ βββ βββββββββ
It takes for βββββββ ββββ βββββββ βββ βββββ βββ βββββββ β ββββββββ βββββββββ βββ ββββ ββ ββββ ββββββ βββ β βββββββ ββ ββ βββββββββ
It confuses attracting β ββββββββ βββββββββ ββββ βββββββ β ββββββββ βββββββββ ββββ ββββββ βββ β βββββββ ββ ββ βββββββββ
It treats a βββββββββ βββββββββ βββ ββ βββββββββββββββ βββββ βββββββββ ββ ββ ββ ββββ β ββββββββββ ββββββββββ
It uses two ββββββ ββ βββ ββββ βββββββββββ βββββββ βββββββββββββββ βββββ
It takes for βββββββ ββββ ββ βββββββββββββββ ββββ βββββββ ββ ββ ββββββ βββ ββββββββ