Physicists posit that at first our universe was infinitesimally small and infinitely hot and dense. ██ ████ █████████ █ ██████ ██ █████████ ██████ ███████ █████████ ████ ███ ██████ ███ ██ ███ █████ █████████ ██ ██████ ███ █████
█████████ ██ ██████████ ████ ███████ ███ ████████ █████ ███ ███ ████ ███ ███ █ ██████ ██████ ██████ ████ ██ ██████ ████████████ ████ ██ ██████████ ████ ████ ██████ ███
███████ ███ ████ ████ █████████ ██████████ ██ ███ ████ █████ ██ ████ ███ ██████████ ██ ███████ ███ ████ ██ ████ ██ ████████ ██ ███ ██████ ███ ██ ███████████████ █████ ███████ ████ ███████████ ███████ ██ █████ ████████████████████ █████████ ████ █████ ███████ █████████ ███████ █████ ███ ████ ████ ███ █ ██████ ██ ██ ██████████ ████ ███ ██ ██ ██ ████████ ██████████ ██ ██████ ███████ ██ ██ ████ ██████ ██ ██ ██████ ██████ ███████ █████████ ███
█████ ███ ███ ████ ███████ ███ ████ ████████ ████ ███ ██████ ███ ██ ███████████████ ██ ██ █ ███████ ███ █████ ██████ ████ ████ █ ██████ ████ ███ █████ ████████ ██ █████ █████ ████ █ ███ ███████ ████████ ██ ██ █████████ ████████ ██████████████ ███ ████ ██████████ █████ ██████ ████ █ ████████ █████████ ███████ ██████████ ███
██████ ████████ ███ █████ ████ ████ █████ █████ ███ █████ ██████ ██ ██████ ████ █████████ ██ ███ █████████ ██████ ██████████ █████ ███████ ███ █████████ ████████ ████ █████████ ████ █████ ████████████ ███ ████████ █████ ███ ███ █████ ██ ████ █████ ██████ █████████ ██ ████ ███ ██████ ███
██ ████ █████ █████ ███ ███████ █████ ████ ████████ ███ ████████ █████ ██████ ██ ███ █████ ██ ███████ █ ██████ ██████████ ████ ██ ███ ████████ ██ ███ ██████████ ███ ████████ ██ ███ ████████ ██ ███ ████ █████████ ██████ ██ ██ ██████ ███ ████ █ ██████ ██████
The author’s reference to a ██████████ ██ ███████ ███ ████████ ██ ███ █████ █████████ █████████ ██████ ██
question a presupposition ██ ███ ███ ████ ██████
Garriga and Vilenkin’s research doesn’t disagree with or question a presupposition of the Big Bang theory, so (A) doesn’t describe the author’s purpose in referencing Garriga and Vilenkin’s suggestion.
raise a potential █████████ ██ ███████ ███ ████████ ██████
Carroll and Chen use Garriga and Vilenkin’s suggestion to develop their own theory; there is not an adversarial relationship between the two ideas. The author doesn’t reference Garriga and Vilenkin in order to object to Carroll and Chen.
illustrate an implication ██ ███████ ███ ████████ ██████
This reverses the relationship. Carroll and Chen take implications from Garriga and Vilenkin’s theory; Garriga and Vilenkin’s suggestion isn’t an implication of Carroll and Chen’s theory.
show how a ██████ ██████ ██ ███████ ███ ████ ██ ████████ ██████ ███████ ███ ██████ ██████
This is the purpose of the author’s reference to Garriga and Vilenkin’s suggestion. The puzzle raised by Carroll and Chen is the
suggest an alternative ███████████ ██ ███ ████████ ████ █████ ███████ ███ ████████ ██████ ██ █████
Garriga and Vilenkin’s suggestion doesn’t propose an alternative to Carroll and Chen’s theory, so (E) doesn’t describe the author’s purpose in referencing Garriga and Vilenkin’s suggestion.
Answer five questions and we'll estimate your score.
It takes about five minutes.
Take the free diagnosticWant to know why the right answer is right?
7Sage membership unlocks explanations of every question. Every answer choice. On every official PrepTest. Start with a free account.
By signing up you agree to our
terms of service.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy
and
Terms of Service
apply.