Some literary theorists argue that since literary works are expressions of ideology, it is naive to view them as embodying a distinct aesthetic value to a greater or lesser degree. βββ βββββ βββββββββ ββββββββ ββββββββββ ββββββββ βββββ ββ βββββ βββββββββββ βββββββββββ ββββ βββ ββββ ββ ββββ βββββββββββ βββ βββββββββββ ββββββββββ βββββ βββββββββ βββββββ ββ βββ ββββ ββββ ββββ ββ ββββββββββ
The theorists who argue that it is naive to view literary works as embodying varying levels of aesthetic value succumb to the this very view. This is because these theorists judge literary works based on how interesting and successful they are.
The claim showcases how these theorists engage in thinking they disagree with. It is a premise supporting the main conclusion.
Analysis by Kasey.Pataki
The claim that the literary βββββββββ ββββββββ ββββββββββ ββββββββ βββββ ββ βββββ βββββββββββ βββββββββββ ββββ βββ ββββ ββ ββββ βββββββββββ βββ ββββββββββ βββββ βββββ βββ ββ βββ βββββββββ βββββ ββ βββ βββββββββ
It is presented ββ ββββββββ βββ βββ ββββββββββ ββββ ββ ββ βββββ ββ ββββ ββββββββ βββββ ββ βββββββββ β ββββββββ βββββββββ βββββ ββ β βββββββ ββ ββββββ βββββββ
It is presented ββ ββββββββ βββββββ βββ βββββ ββββ ββ ββ βββββ ββ ββββ ββββββββ βββββ ββ βββββββββ β ββββββββ βββββββββ βββββ ββ β βββββββ ββ ββββββ βββββββ
It is a ββββββββββ βββ βββββ βββ βββββ ββββ ββ ββ βββββ ββ ββββββββ ββββ ββββββββ βββββ ββββββ β ββββββββ βββββββββ βββββ ββ β βββββββ ββ ββββββ ββββββ ββ βββββββ ββ βββββββββ
It is presented ββ ββββββββ βββ βββ ββββββββββ ββββ βββ ββββββββ βββββββββ βββββββ ββ βββ ββββ ββββ ββββ ββ ββββββββββ
It is presented ββ ββββββββ βββββββ βββ βββββ ββββ ββββββββ βββββ βββ βββββββββββ ββ βββββββββ