Discovered in 1993, the site known as Ukhaa Tolgod, in the Gobi desert of Mongolia, is one of the world's best sources of fossils from the Late Cretaceous period, which ended about 65 million years ago. ███ █████████ ███████ ███ ██████ ███████ ████ ████ █████ █████████ ████████ ██████████ ████ ████ █ ███████████ ███████ ███ ███████████████ ████ ██████████ ███
Inconsistent with sandstorm hypothesis because the pebbles are too large to have been windblown. This is the type that contains all of the vertebrate skeletal fossils.
Implications of hypothesis ·Sandslide hypothesis suggests area was not sterile desert
Passage Style
Critique or debate
Phenomenon-hypothesis (RC)
Analysis by KevinLin
22.
Which one of the following ████ ██████████ █████████ ███ ████ █████ ██ ███ ████████
Question Type
Main point
The author proposes a hypothesis for why the fossils at Ukhaa Tolgod are so well-preserved. Rejecting the view that sandstorms caused the fossils to be well-preserved, the author proposes that sandslides may be the true explanation. The author advances this hypothesis in P2, P3 and P4, after discussing evidence against the sandstorm hypothesis in P2. Let’s look for an answer that capture the hypothesis the author advocates.
Not supported, because the author never suggests that scientists have “settled” on an explanation for how sandslides occurred at Ukhaa Tolgod. It’s not even an established fact that sandslides occurred at this location. The author proposes evidence that sandslides occurred, but it’s not an established fact that anyone has a settled view about. Since (B) isn’t supported, it can’t be the main point.
This doesn’t capture the author’s believe that sandslides, not sandstorms, may explain why the fossils are so well-preserved. Although it’s true that the author believes Ukhaa Tolgod may have been a stable dune field, the point isn’t to establish this possibility. It’s to explain why the fossils at Ukhaa Tolgod are so well preserved.
This best captures the author’s main point, which is that there’s evidence sandslides, not sandstorms, preserved the fossils at Ukhaa Tolgod. The author suggests that animals died from sandslides, which helped preserve their fossils. The author advances this hypothesis in P2, P3 and P4, after discussing evidence against the sandstorm hypothesis in P2. Let’s look for an answer that capture the hypothesis the author advocates.
This doesn’t capture the author’s believe that sandslides, not sandstorms, may explain why the fossils are so well-preserved.
Difficulty
66% of people who answer get this correct
This is a difficult question.
It is similar in difficulty to other questions in this passage.
CURVE
Score of students with a 50% chance of getting this right
25%140
153
75%165
Analysis
Main point
Critique or debate
Phenomenon-hypothesis (RC)
Science
Answer Popularity
PopularityAvg. score
a
1%
148
b
4%
155
c
24%
157
d
66%
163
e
5%
154
Question history
You don't have any history with this question.. yet!
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Hold on there, you need to slow down.
We love that you want post in our discussion forum! Just come back in a bit to post again!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.