Council president: Councilmember Smith has proposed a new city ordinance prohibiting the use of the "bait-and-switch" sales tactic. █████ ████ ████ ████████ ████ █████ ███ ██ █████ ██ █████████ █████ ████ ███ ██████ ███ ███ ███ ██ ████████████████ ████████ ███████ ████████ █████████ ████ ███ ████ █████ ██████████████
The council president concludes that Smith’s proposal to prohibit bait-and-switch sales tactics doesn’t merit consideration. As support, the president says that Smith used to own an appliance store that used bait-and-switch sales tactics.
This is a source attack. The president doesn’t say anything about the merit of Smith’s proposal; the only support for the president’s conclusion is the fact that Smith used to engage in the behavior that he is now trying to prohibit.
Analysis by ZoeLight
The council president's reasoning is ████ ██████████ ██ █████████ ██ ███ ███████ ████ ███ █████████
dismisses the proposed █████████ ███████ ██ ███ ██████ ██████ ████ ███████ ██ ███ ███████
takes a single ████ ████ ██ ████████████ ████ █ █████ ██ ██████ ██ ████ ████ █████ ██ ██ █████
fails to make █ ██████ ███████████ ███████ █████████ █████ ███████ ███ ██████████ ███████ ██ ██████████ █████
draws a conclusion ████ ██████ ████████ █ █████ █████████ ██ ███████ ██ ████ ██████████
generalizes from a ███████ ██████ ██ █████████ ██ █ ███████ ████ ██ ███ █████████ ██ ████ ████