Advertisement: Support Clark brand-name parts are made for cars manufactured in this country. ████ ███████ ███ ██ ███ ██████████ ██████████ ███████████ ████████ ████ █████ ██ ███ ██████ ████ ████████████ ██████ ███ █████ ████ █████ █████ ██ ████████ ███ █████ ███ █████ ███████████ ████ ███ ██████ ███████████ ███ ██████ ██ ████ ███ ████████ ██ ███████ ██ ████████ ██████████ ██ █████ ███ ██████ ██ ██████████ █████ ██ █████ ███ ████ ████
The premises in this stimulus are all absolute claims (Clark parts have this feature; foreign parts have that feature), while the conclusion is relative (Clark parts are better than foreign parts). The argument essentially presents two independent pros and cons lists and concludes one option is better than the other:
Clark Parts
- Made for cars in this country.
- Satisfy all government tests (the toughest).
Foreign-Made Parts
- Some are good and some are poorly constructed.
- You never know which ones are which.
Conclusion: Clark parts are better than foreign-made parts.
This is a useful lens, but it’s not mandatory. (You can also think of this argument in net effect terms, for example.) Really what you need to bring with you from the stimulus into the answer choices is a firm understanding of every claim and a willingness to test the answers against those claims.
Analysis by MichaelWright
The argument requires the assumption ████
Clark parts are █████████ ████ ██ ████ ███████
foreign-made parts are ███ ████████ ███ ████ ████████████ ██ ████ ███████
no foreign-made parts ███████ ███ ██████████ █████████
parts that satisfy ███ ██████████ █████████ ███ ███ ██ ██████ ███████████ ██ █████ ████████ ████ █████
if parts are ████ ███ ████ ████████████ ██ ███ ████████ ████ ███ ███ ██████ ███████████