PT105.S1.Q13 > Question

SECTION 1 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26

SECTION 2 · lr

SECTION 3 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7

PASSAGE 2

Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14

PASSAGE 3

Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21

PASSAGE 4

Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26

SECTION 4 · lr

The author considers a question of whether artists who receive public subsidies should repay those subsidies and concludes that artists are morally required to do so. As evidence, the author states that returning the money would be a source of support for other artists deserving of public subsidies.

The author establishes an artists moral obligation by suggesting other artists would be able to receive the same benefit if the public subsidies were repaid.

The author does not suggest an artist’s moral obligation is based on other people’s past actions. The subsidy an artist is initially granted if funded by the public, but this money could have a different source other than another artist’s repayment.

The author’s support for his conclusion is that, if the subsidy is repaid, other deserving artists would have access to this source of support.

The author does not mention whether an author made a promise to repay the funds before being granted the subsidy.

The author does not compare short and long term benefits or detriments.

The author does not mention what benefits or costs an artist repaying a subsidy would incur.

PrepTest 105 - Section 1 - Question 13

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action