Since Support Mayor Drabble always repays her political debts as soon as possible, Conclusion she will almost certainly appoint Lee to be the new head of the arts commission. ███ ███ ██████ ████ ███ ███ █ ████ █████ ███ ███████ ████ ███ █ ███ ███ ███ ███████ ██ ███ ████ █████████
Here's the argument distilled:
P1: Drabble repays her political debts ASAP.
P2: She has a big political debt to Lee.
P3: Appointing Lee to the commission is one way to repay that debt (ish).
—
Con: Drabble will (probs) appoint Lee to the commission.
We can view both of this argument's core assumptions through the relative v. absolute lens – appointing Lee to the arts commission might be a good (absolute) option, but that doesn't mean it's the best (relative) option.
Lee v. other people: Lee's claim to the job might be strong in absolute terms but not the strongest – someone else could outrank him.
This appointment v. other repayment options: this appointment might be a good way to repay Lee in absolute terms but not the best – another method could be better (or even equally good).
Analysis by MichaelWright
Which one of the following ██ ██ ██████████ ██ █████ ███ ████████ ████████
Mayor Drabble has ██ █████████ ████ ████ ██ ████ ██ ██████ ████████ ████ ███ ███ ███ ████ ██ ███ ███ █████ ██ ████████ ██ ██████ ██ ██ ███████████ ██ ██ ███ ███ ████ ██ ███ ████ ███████████
There is no ███ ██ ████ █████ ███████ ████ █ ███████ █████████ ████ ███ ███████ ██ ███ ████ ████████ ████ ███ █████████ ████ ███ ████ ██ ████
Lee is the ████ ██████ ██ ████ █████ ███████ ████ █ █████████ ████ ███ █████ ██ ███████ ██ ██████ ██ ███████████ ████ ███ ██ ███ ███ ████ ██ ███ ████ ███████████
Whether Lee is █████████ ██ ████ ███ ████ ██████████ ██ ██████████ ██ █████ ███████████ █████████
The only way ████ █████ ███████ ███ ██████████ █████ ███ █████████ ████ ██ ███ ██ ██ ██████████ ███ ██ ████ ███ ████ ███████████