PT23.S1.Q3

PrepTest 23 - Section 1 - Question 3

Show analysis

Support The United States has never been a great international trader. ██ █████ ████ ██ ███ ███ █████████ ███ █████████ ███ ████████ ████████ ██████ ███ ███ ████████ ███ ████████ ████████████ ██ ████ █████████ ████ ██████ █████████ ██ ████ ███████ ███ ████ ███ ███████ ███████ ████ ██ ███ █████ ███ ██ █ ██████████ ███ ███████ ███████ ██████████ ███ █████ ██ ██████ █ ███████ ███ ██ ████ ████ ███████ ███████ █████ ████ █ ███ ███ ████ ██ ██████ ███ ███ █████

Argument Structure

The author starts by making a general claim about the United States: it has never been a "great international trader," focusing instead on manufacturing and selling products domestically. The author then points out what she claims are consequences of this approach: the US owes the world's largest amount of foreign debt, and is a "playground" for foreign investors. The author concludes that countries need foreign trade, a point she expresses metaphorically by comparing a country without foreign trade to a dog eating its tail.

Describe Method of Reasoning

The author reaches her conclusion on the basis of one specific example: the United States' historic focus on domestic rather than international trade. She makes a causal claim about this example, claiming that the U.S.'s approach led to its current "terrible" situation. She draws a conclusion expressed through a analogy: a country trying to live without foreign trade is like a dog eating its own tail.

User Avatar Analysis by ArdaschirArguelles
Show answer
3.

In order to advance her █████ ██ █████ ███ ██████ ████ ████ ██ ███ █████████ ██████

a

draw on an ███████

b

appeal to historical ████

c

identify a cause ███ ██ ██████

d

suggest a cause ██ ███ ███████ ████████ █████████

e

question the ethical █████ ██ ██ ████████ █████████

Confirm action

Are you sure?