Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Categories
- 32.5K All Categories
- 27.4K LSAT
- 16.6K General
- 5.1K Logical Reasoning
- 1.3K Reading Comprehension
- 1.7K Logic Games
- 73 Podcasts
- 193 Webinars
- 9 Scholarships
- 193 Test Center Reviews
- 2K Study Groups
- 108 Study Guides/Cheat Sheets
- 2.5K Specific LSAT Dates
- 26 June 2024 LSAT
- 3 April 2024 LSAT
- 11 February 2024 LSAT
- 23 January 2024 LSAT
- 37 November 2023 LSAT
- 42 October 2023 LSAT
- 12 September 2023 LSAT
- 38 August 2023 LSAT
- 27 June 2023 LSAT
- 13 August 2024 LSAT
- 30 Sage Advice
- 4.9K Not LSAT
- 4K Law School Admissions
- 13 Law School Explained
- 10 Forum Rules
- 594 Technical Problems
- 281 Off-topic
PTC.S2.Q22 - One can be at home and be in the backyard...
alexazysman
Alum Member
Can someone help with this question!
Comments
the argument is like this:
home and /house
house and /home
not (house ---> home)
so the conclusion that being at home is not necessary for being in one's own house is supported by the premise that we can be in our house without being at home. The first premise (home and /house) isn't used to support our conclusion, which is why C is correct because it doesn't contradict anything, nor does it support our conclusion. it's existence is just compatible with our argument. I hope this helps!