PTA.S1.Q16 - Giordano Bruno, the Renaissance...

Tamara ZymanTamara Zyman Alum Member
edited July 2023 in Logical Reasoning 58 karma

This is a weakening question type. The argument is stating that Bruno must have been a spy, the premise says that the spy was the only clergyman working at the embassy at that time. The assumption to make the argument week must be A, cause its stating that Bruno was no longer a clergyman once he started working at the embassy.

Admin Note: Edited title. Please use the format: "PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of the question."

Comments

  • Tamara ZymanTamara Zyman Alum Member
    58 karma

    This is a weakening question type. The argument is stating that Bruno must have been a spy, the premise says that the spy was the only clergyman working at the embassy at that time. The assumption to make the argument week must be A, cause its stating that Bruno was no longer a clergyman once he started working at the embassy.

Sign In or Register to comment.