http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-23-section-2-question-14/
It seems as answer A is actually agreeing with Lee's argument. Am I incorrect by thinking that the question stem is asking for us to refute Lee's argument?
When JY is explaining not ( group 4 Logical operator) he does not apply the not to the come home idea. i understand its function as a logical operator but why doesn't not affix itself to /CH as in the description of Group 3.
I got this question correct, but I marked it for BR because I like analyzing parallel questions for practice. During BR, I am having a ton of trouble eliminating B.
Specifically, the flaw in the argument is your typical invalid argument ...
... using the Cambridge bundle (1-40 split by type, and 41 ... 36). I took PTs 36-40 by viewing the LR questions ... my scores for PT 36-40 were not much higher (went ...